Aaron Davidson flat out said he asked Hornady why they didn't load for -284 and that was their response, that there was too much variability in chambering for them to load for it with low enough risk ... as in insurance company said no.
I thought Hornady was the cartridge experts, not their insurance company? Maybe they should trade businesses...
This is more people now than ever, the weight chasing race is finally coming to hunting just as it came to backpacking.
Yes, and it's just as irritating chasing ounces on a gun, as folks who chase a couple pounds for their drag car.
I am interested in your stats for this. If its from mostly associating with others on specialized forums like these I think either you have a confirmation bias that most reload, or your idea of "serious" just rules out anyone that uses factory ammo... even if it was true I dont see how its bad to give options to people that don't
My stats are based on what I hear, the folks I know, the folks I talk to, the folks who post here. Some people might be shooters and hunters, but don't have the money to get into reloading, or the time. Those are not the people I'm referring to. I'm referring to those who do, but would just rather buy a crap-shoot off the shelf, and expect it to do what tailored handloads will do...Which rarely happens.
Are you saying Hornadys factory loads cant shoot? I hope not, because I've been told by multiple builders now to try PH and Match first on various calibers because customers are shooting absolute bugholes and deciding not to reload. The last was specifically about PRC.
Once again, no... I shot HOrnady for years, and their old LE red box TAP .308 168 BTHP ammo shot 1-hole groups in my old custom .308. I'm not saying their ammo doesn't shoot at all... Don't put words in my mouth. What I'm saying is, don't expect it to shoot in every gun you buy. Nature of the beast, it just doesn't work that way.
My impressions of this statement is... the average hunter that buys box ammo is incapable of safety, and performance. Therefore, factory options designed for a common shooter are not only pointless but negative for the market.
Take it how you want, that's not how I meant it. I meant it as, the average hunter you will encounter in the woods can't even take a clean 150-200 yard shot on a deer, so how can you honestly feel safe with them now having ammo and guns capable of shooting to 1000 yards at an affordable price? Every armchair sniper in the world will think they're Chris Kyle... I don't feel any safer, quite the opposite. I used to sell guns and work in a gun store... I've met these people...MANY MANY MANY of them. Which was enough to make me stop hunting public land.
This entire caliber exists because Hornady is in the business to make money. For some reason that a terrible thing now and means the caliber is useless even though it delivers what it was designed to do, and fills a niche that was open. Stupid people being stupid doesn't have anything to do with it and shouldn't be a reason to dislike a product, if so we are pretty screwed because there's quite a few of them. I swear more than ever people cant stand having extra options.
Everything you own exists because someone was in the business of making money. That's a given. And no, that's not a terrible thing. It's the fact they are falsely enabling people who don't possess the discipline, training, and skills to shoot 1/10 of that distance, and yet, they now can afford this stuff, and will make our sport look bad. And it doesn't help that most of these people own 2 main cartridges... 6.5 CM and .300 WinMag. Why? Back to that wannabe sniper mentality... Their idiot buddies who also don't know **** about guns, told them the 6.5CM will shoot 5,000 yards like a laser beam, and the .300WM will drop elephants 3 in a row. With these newbies, it's literally the blind leading the blind, and things become hipster trends... I'm not a trendy person. I don't buy into fads...Never have, never will. That's why I dislike the product. It has nothing to do with the product itself.
Edit* This comes off more negative than I meant it after re-reading. I don't mean it to do so.