• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

6.5 156 EOL

Have you guys noticed any real ballistic gains with this bullet compared to the 147 eld-m? I have a load worked up for the 147 @ 2930fps in my 6.5x284 and looking at Shooter I'm not seeing any real difference in drift or drop, but I haven't shot the 147 enough to guarantee the published BCs are accurate. The 140 eld-m drops right with the data to 1000 so I'd assume the 147 does as well
 
Last edited:
Have you guys noticed any real ballistic gains with this bullet compared to the 147 eld-m? I have a load worked up for the 147 @ 2930fps in my 6.5x284 and looking at Shooter I'm not seeing any real difference in drift or drop, but I haven't shot the 147 enough to guarantee the published BCs are accurate. The 140 eld-m drops right with the data to 1000 so I'd assume the 147 does as well
If you read through this thread you will see where ballistic charts have been posted.

There isn't a sizable gain from the 147 in ballistics (unless we're talking terminal ballistics), however retained energy is better, and the 156 doesn't loose much velocity from the 147 when loaded to the same pressures. I would guess this is due to the shorter bearing surface. People are getting 2900-3000 with good loads out of the 156 with Reloder 26 in a 6.5x284.
 
Have you guys noticed any real ballistic gains with this bullet compared to the 147 eld-m? I have a load worked up for the 147 @ 2930fps in my 6.5x284 and looking at Shooter I'm not seeing any real difference in drift or drop, but I haven't shot the 147 enough to guarantee the published BCs are accurate. The 140 eld-m drops right with the data to 1000 so I'd assume the 147 does as well

Using the Berger 156 EOL with R26 in my 26" barreled 6.5x284's I have been able to generate velocity in the 3000-3025FPS range with excellent accuracy and ES at safe pressures. IMO, the engineers did a great job with the bullet design given I didn't expect to get much over 2950FPS. I suppose the relatively short bearing surface has much to do with the results. From a ballistic standpoint, drops and wind drift is not materially different from a 140hr Berger HVLD driven at 3050FPS using R26 and delivering comparable accuracy and ES to the 156EOL. The major benefit of the 156 is terminal energy and penetration(sectional density). Given this bullet has expansion characteristics comparable to the 140HVLD, the 156 buys you and additional 15-20% greater energy at any given range and, in my case, get me an increase of 1000FPE normally capped out at 1000 yards, extended an additional 200 yards. I personally didn't pursue the Hornady 147 ELDM because the improvement didn't seem significant enough, best case, falling between the 140 and 156. IMO.
 
Using the Berger 156 EOL with R26 in my 26" barreled 6.5x284's I have been able to generate velocity in the 3000-3025FPS range with excellent accuracy and ES at safe pressures. IMO, the engineers did a great job with the bullet design given I didn't expect to get much over 2950FPS. I suppose the relatively short bearing surface has much to do with the results. From a ballistic standpoint, drops and wind drift is not materially different from a 140hr Berger HVLD driven at 3050FPS using R26 and delivering comparable accuracy and ES to the 156EOL. The major benefit of the 156 is terminal energy and penetration(sectional density). Given this bullet has expansion characteristics comparable to the 140HVLD, the 156 buys you and additional 15-20% greater energy at any given range and, in my case, get me an increase of 1000FPE normally capped out at 1000 yards, extended an additional 200 yards. I personally didn't pursue the Hornady 147 ELDM because the improvement didn't seem significant enough, best case, falling between the 140 and 156. IMO.
Greyfox, what twist are you using in your 6.5x284s with the 156?
 
How does 156 perform on impact at higher velocities? Let say 2600fps+ on impact? Does it explode? Also whats the lowest expansion fps? 1600? 1800? 2000? And overall in which impact range does this bullet perform best? For example eldms reported to work best in 2200-2600 range.
 
Last edited:
How does 156 perform on impact at higher velocities? Let say 2600fps+ on impact? Does it explode? Also whats the lowest expansion fps? 1600? 1800? 2000? And overall in which impact range does this bullet perform best? For example eldms reported to work best in 2200-2600 range.
150 yard exit. Velocity started at 2940 fps.
Resized952019092295201647.jpg



And the entrance

Resized952019092295201620.jpg
 
Continued....

Needless to say, I'm confident on deer and antelope sized game. We have recovered 1 bullet from my deer after a high shoulder/bottom of spine impact, which is the shoulder above the pic of the bullet. Ranges out to 690 so far. We still have general bull elk and late season cow/calf elk, we should get a total of 5 elk with this bullet to experiment on. Tomorrow, with any luck, we will test it on a mule deer from my dad's .264 win mag. He has a decent one scouted out, we just gotta beat everyone else to it ha ha.
Resized952019092295201356.jpg
Resized952019092295201402.jpg
Resized952019092295163959.jpg
Resized952019092295201631.jpg
Resized952019092295201641.jpg
Resized952019092995122124.jpg
Resized952019092295174709.jpg
20190815_184259.jpg
20190815_132322.jpg
 
Last edited:
Top