Just wondering if anyone had real world experience on game at higher velocity. Wondering how it would hold together at shorter ranges. I also have the same Sako rifle in .308 and it shoots these same 165 Game Changers into nice groups at just under 2,700 FPS. I know the .308 will be great in 95% of the shot opportunities, but I like the extra range of the 300 WM just in case a longer shot presents itself.
I know this combo (165 grn @ 3,200 FPS) could be overkill in most situations. However, last year I shot a nice deer with my .308 at about 175 yards using a 150 TTSX at 2,800 FPS. Deer was uphill, died quickly, and everything worked out great. The day before, we spotted a even nicer buck across a canyon at 450 yards. I had the crosshairs on him for awhile, but didn't pull the trigger. If the shot didn't anchor him, he could (very likely) have gone down into a very steep canyon and not be recoverable. I would have taken the shot if I had my 300 WM with the 165 Sierra at 3,200 FPS.
You may consider it overkill, I consider it insurance!
No bullet can guarantee DRT at 450 yards. They will kill and the variables to how far an animal will go after the shot are endless. Of course if you are able to hit high shoulder etc, then MAYBE it will be DRT and won't "run" upwards 100+ yards dead on its feet which is what most bullets achieve after hits. There are no magic bullets powered by pixie dust that will do this. Then again if the Sierra 165 GC was loaded with RL26 maybe?