PNWdude67
Well-Known Member
To put an arbitrary distance of 400 yards is not relevant to all hunts. I put more effort into the stalks and scouting hikes I did on my hunt in the Jarbidge wilderness last fall than any hunt I have ever been on. A horse would have helped a lot!! lol but for this old man go do it on my boots was a physical challenge. I encountered a 5 point bull first light of opening day 200 yards from my tent and he was at 47 yards!! That was pure chance, and I could have harvested him as he stood there barking at me trying to figure out what I was. I passed because I wanted to have a hunt! And boy did I. The elk I harvested the next day was at 740 yards and I spotted him from over 3000 yards away across a deep draining and a mile up another. 3.5 hours of hard hiking to get into position. That was a hell of a hunt and a good shot as well. So the distance a shot is executed has little correlation to the challenge of the hunt leading up to the shot. It all depends.Your observations and hunting style are spot on. I've hunted all over Alaska, New Zealand and Africa for 60 years and I've noted that the hunt is over when the bullet is in the air. To me, it is short-sighted to hunt at distances beyond 400 yards. There is rarely any stalking involved and the shot is the skill, not the hunting. The animal that is hunted for "sport" dies in earnest. Give him the dignity of a fair hunt.