It doubles the cost of a good barrel. It doubles to qudruples the bbl life. Do the math.
I have run 2 nitrided barrels, each set up on two SwitchLug actions, and compared them against two non- nitrided.
One was a 6.5 Sherman, the other a 7STW. All four barrels were Bartlein 3Bs.
I checked the throat erosion every 100 rds fired and switched barrels. Used the Wheeler method and same bullets to verify lands movement.
It was not a scientific test, but I was trying to get info on whether it was worth the extra money.
Both nitrided barrels had a slight advantage at 400 rounds on both rifles. I have not shot the STW except for hunting, so I removed it from testing.
At 700 rds on the 6.5 Sherman, the non- nitrided barrel showed noticeable less erosion than the nitrided barrel.
The nitrided barrel showed more fire cracking. I ended the testing at that point and only use the nitrided for fire forming. 980 rds on the non-nitrided 6.5 Sherman and I'm still shooting it, just a bit longer to clean it.
I will not nitride another barrel as it was not worth it in the long run, but I do prefer nitrided actions.
Sorry for bumping the OP's thread.