• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Trying to get over 3000 fps for 300 WM and 180 grain Accubond

To be honest, I was hoping to get to 3000+ fps to see if I could get there. I am shooting sub MOA groups at 100 yds with the 180 grain Accubonds, using H1000, and was hoping to find a load where I could get both. I am really enjoying working different aspects of reloading, i.e. different powders, neck tension, distance off lands, etc. Like I said in my original post, I am working up a load for elk, here. I will be zereoing at 200 yds and have a range I can shoot out to 600 yds. Time will tell if I will be comfortable shooting that far. I was thinking if I can get the bullet over 3000 fps, at the muzzle, that will carry plenty of energy out to 400-500 yds for an ethical kill. I may be off base, but that was my thinking.
 
To be honest, I was hoping to get to 3000+ fps to see if I could get there. I am shooting sub MOA groups at 100 yds with the 180 grain Accubonds, using H1000, and was hoping to find a load where I could get both. I am really enjoying working different aspects of reloading, i.e. different powders, neck tension, distance off lands, etc. Like I said in my original post, I am working up a load for elk, here. I will be zereoing at 200 yds and have a range I can shoot out to 600 yds. Time will tell if I will be comfortable shooting that far. I was thinking if I can get the bullet over 3000 fps, at the muzzle, that will carry plenty of energy out to 400-500 yds for an ethical kill. I may be off base, but that was my thinking.
I shot an elk at 600 yards this year with my .308 win and a 155 grain TMK. 300 WM has way more zip, so I think you'll be fine either way.
 
I for some reason have had faster velocities with Sierra bullets. I just assumed it was the jacket copper that Sierra used. Don't know for sure, but have proved it with a chrono.
 
Would a better answer be to step down in bullet weight? Either a 165 grain Accubond or a 168 grain Barnes TTSX? How does everyone feel about one of those lighter bullets versus 180 with a little less speed? Am I going down a unnecessary rabbit hole here?
 
FEENIX, the Accubonds got harder to source simply because of Nosler. Competing brands ... thought you might like the pix...

View attachment 624027
FEENIX, the Accubonds got harder to source simply because of Nosler. Competing brands ... thought you might like the pix...

View attachment 624027
I am fully aware of that. The fact is that Nosler made the Acccubonds, not Hornady. I was a long-time Nosler user (NP, NAB, NBT, and LRAB) before transitioning to Berger bullets. I also used Hornady IB, SST, and A-Max.
 
I have been working on an elk load for my 300 Win Mag. I have chosen to shoot either a Nosler Accubond or Barnes TTSX, both in 180 grain. I have worked with H-1000, but even a compressed load gets me to the low 2900 fps range. I have been thinking of trying RL-19, but havent found powder Min-Max amounts yet. Does anyone have those powder numbers or another powder I could try to get over 3000fps? Thanks for any help. I appreciate it.
RL26 will get you there if you can find it.
 
I've gotten 3050 fps from one 24" bbl 300 Win Mag and 3100 fps from a 26" bbl 300 Win Mag using IMR7977 powder and a Berger 190 VLDH bullet. Both guns have exhibited 1/2 MOA accuracy with that powder & bullet.

Since that powder is no longer availabe I would use H1000.
 
I have a Remington 700 that has a long throated 26 inch barrel. COAL is 3.6 inches and with 7828 velocity is above 3,100 with a 180 Partition. The problem is however with that long length the second bullet gets it's point damaged from the recoil.
It's a great rifle.
 
I have 2 powders that get 3160-3180fps SAFELY in a 26" tube with 180g Accubonds, those being RL25 & 780 Supreme (discontinued). The other, with specific loading techniques, is Retumbo.
H1000 produces between 3030 to 3080 in my 5 300WM rifles, all have 26" tubes.
I even get 2980fps with 210g ABLR in 2 of them and H1000.

Cheers.
 
Top