Kyle Wheeler
Well-Known Member
I really enjoy this magnification range on scopes. After using both of these I am still a little torn. Both tracked well for me and these are a few of my findings. Keep in mind these are both great japanese scopes but curious what others have found or prefer.
LHT pros:
-lightweight
-0.35 MOA center dot
-Outer lines really helped me zero in on center dot
-Elevation knob is locking
LHT cons:
-Windage knob is mushy
-Seems to scratch easily
-Parallax and zoom are stiff
-It was durable for me but it is very light so not sure if it would stand up to the same standards as Credo
Credo pros:
-Very tough overall
-Great illumination
-Windage turret more tactile
-Built in throw lever
-2.5X low end
Credo cons:
-Reticle a little thin for me at low light
-Few ounces heavier than LHT
-0.25 center dot. I did like the 0.35 on LHT for my eyes
LHT pros:
-lightweight
-0.35 MOA center dot
-Outer lines really helped me zero in on center dot
-Elevation knob is locking
LHT cons:
-Windage knob is mushy
-Seems to scratch easily
-Parallax and zoom are stiff
-It was durable for me but it is very light so not sure if it would stand up to the same standards as Credo
Credo pros:
-Very tough overall
-Great illumination
-Windage turret more tactile
-Built in throw lever
-2.5X low end
Credo cons:
-Reticle a little thin for me at low light
-Few ounces heavier than LHT
-0.25 center dot. I did like the 0.35 on LHT for my eyes