Yup, that pretty much sums up my concerns. But I don't know if they apply to the Triggertech design.
I would LOVE to see a thorough analysis of the Triggertech design. There are a few considerations that might affect the results despite my misgivings. They are just musings not facts. First, I openly admit that:
1. I like the Triggertech triggers
2. I am concerned about lack of over travel.
3. I don't shoot well enough anymore to test the difference.
So here we go....
1. Does the bullet really leave the barrel before the trigger reaches the end of its travel? I don't know.
2. How much does pull weight affect this? I don't know.
3. Does the fact that pull force does not "release" on the Triggertech affect this? I don't know. What I mean by this is that my finger cannot tell when the sear drops because there is no change in force or movement between unfired and fired.
4. Does the momentum of the trigger finger really affect this? I don't know.
5. Does the roller on the trigger tech affect this? I don't know.
6. Does the apparent lack of creep or travel of any kind in the trigger tech affect this? I don't know.
Lots of questions, no answers.
Trigger Tech triggers have some over travel, I tried to measure it best I could on one of my "special" flat triggers. Assuming no creep as they claim I just used a pair of calipers, zeroed when it touched the trigger & measured where it stopped. On average mid trigger the over travel was .025 and at the bottom of the flat trigger it measured .040 (+/- lets say .002) How that compares to other triggers I'm not sure.
If you want to do the math on how long it takes the bullet to get out the end of the barrel vs. the time it takes a finger to travel .025"
v2 = vo2 + 2as
v is the muzzle velocity
vo is the initial velocity of the bullet, which is zero
a is the acceleration (or finger speed)
s is the barrel length (or trigger travel)
I can't do the math right now...I've got to go work for "the man"
Hope this helps???