Should have quit....while you were ahead!The most accurate bullet I ever used is GS custom. It didn't make a difference which caliber I used. I fired a .06" 3 shot group with 265 grain .375 caliber going average of 3055' per second. I fired another bullet and it opened the group up to .31".
Should have quit....while you were ahead!
It seems like we end up where we started. My No.1 .30-06 just came home with a new Benchmark barrel. I haven't used benchmark before.Me? I've moved back to my comfort zone, working up new loads for my 30-06 and 375 H&H.
375-06 is a pretty good option.It seems like we end up where we started. My No.1 .30-06 just came home with a new Benchmark barrel. I haven't used benchmark before.
I need to get my bench back up and running, but it's first up.
My neck don't do .375 anymore.
I'm going to have to try those 77s in my 223 AI. These "trainer rifles" can go a whole lot further than some people think, for a whole lot cheaper to shoot.
I set it to measure the black rings on the target not the tear out around the impact. If you look at post #13 you can see what I am talking about. My targets are all printed on cheap computer paper and I usually see a fair amount of tear out compared to NRA regulation target type paper.That is a very nice group but you need to re measure it manually. From this picture, at least three of the bullet holes are not completely encompassed within the measuring circles and this leads to errors in group size that calculate a smaller size than it should be.
That makes sense. Didn't realise you weren't using good target paper.I set it to measure the black rings on the target not the tear out around the impact. If you look at post #13 you can see what I am talking about. My targets are all printed on cheap computer paper and I usually see a fair amount of tear out compared to NRA regulation target type paper.
Sometimes you own the range, there are times the range owns you.Sometimes the wind blows them all into the middle.