"To give truth to him who loves it not is but to give him more plentiful material for misinterpretation."
George MacDonald
George MacDonald
Yes but the question here is whether or not its ok to call them an idiot for their misinterpretation. That answer applies to all misinterpretations regardless of which truth they misinterpreted."To give truth to him who loves it not is but to give him more plentiful material for misinterpretation."
George MacDonald
I is reely serprised u ain't eegnored me yet.I've only ignored a few people, and to be honest it was mostly for the way they spell things. (Grammer/lack of punctuation/too much punctuation, etc. Sometimes it is just too hard to read!)
Oh trust me, I usually edit my posts about three times after posting, because I apparently can't learn to proof read before I post, and I almost inevitably mistype something in every postI is reely serprised u ain't eegnored me yet.
To clarify, I know how to type and speak correctly. I just really like to keep the predictive apple keyboard confused.
I'll check in with you after you spend 20 years in this industry on forums trying to help people in this discipline improve, only to be attacked on a daily basis by the loudest and most obnoxious of the bunch every single day. They live in a suburb and drive an hour to a square range maybe once a month to get some rounds down range... but they know just as much as someone that spends over 15,000rnds a year and shoots nearly every single day. Just ask them, they'll tell you!I'm on the side of refraining from ignoring other members. Never have myself. It seems weak
Yeah Orkan, I think as a vendor you have a different level of exposure. You're on a whole nother level from me on here. Certainly wasn't intending to label anyone either. Maybe I sounded self-righteous. Hope that clarifies.I'll check in with you after you spend 20 years in this industry on forums trying to help people in this discipline improve, only to be attacked on a daily basis by the loudest and most obnoxious of the bunch every single day. They live in a suburb and drive an hour to a square range maybe once a month to get some rounds down range... but they know just as much as someone that spends over 15,000rnds a year and shoots nearly every single day. Just ask them, they'll tell you!
I used to feel exactly as you feel about the ignore feature. I never used it a single time in 20 years... until this year. There comes a point when you are no longer willing to sacrifice the peace of the Lord for people that aren't for you, and no matter what you say or how you say it, will never be for you.
Weak? Maybe you'd prefer I go to war with those shameless unprincipled Godless anonymous trolls on the forums every single day as I've done for the past 20 years? Oh wait, then it would be back to getting yelled at for not backing down like a good little drone. If you don't leave them alone when they voice their inexperienced opinions... they will literally band together like a tribe of cannibals and stalk you from forum to forum every day. They demand behavior from you, which they can't be troubled to execute themselves. They are like liberals. If you give in at all, they use your apology as an admission of guilt. There can be no peace with them.
Every time I threaten to leave, I'm begged to stay by people that want what I have to offer. The constant bickering that goes on here and every other forum every day lines the pockets of the forum owners, because page views = ad views... and the constant 30-page argument threads are big money. Not that Len cares about the money, because I don't think he does... but what I'm saying here is that I certainly am not going to proposition him to get rid of the troublemakers. Their presence and the turmoil they create is great revenue, and many forums have taken to hiring trolls to stir the pot and create discourse specifically for this reason. You people think they aren't getting banned by accident?
Len deserves big money for putting up with this trash. I sincerely doubt Len is hiring trolls... but I know for a fact other popular forums are. They can turn a 1 page thread into a 40 page thread... and many of you eat it up like starving rabid dogs.
So, given all available options... what you call weak, those of us that have been doing this for any length of time... call our final option so that we can still be present to provide quality information to those that seek it, but not have to deal with the inexperienced uninformed loud mouths that anonymously prop their manufactured false personalities up by trying to rip everyone else down on here, day after day. I could take the route so many others take, and just not care... but I do care. That's just who I am. I care deeply that people get the best experience-based info I can give them.
So yeah, I'll go ahead and continue to be "weak" and every single time I read a post where someone is letting their ridiculous ego try to mask their total lack of experience... on the ignore list they will go. I currently have roughly 0.06% of people on this forum on ignore. Less than a tenth of one percent of people here, are creating nearly ALL of the problems. Not dealing with them is wonderful. It turns this forum from a hostile loath some affair, into a fun, kind, and happy experience.
My only wish is that everyone that I put on my ignore list, would be unable to see anything I post... so that they can not benefit in any way from my presence, and my presence would not give them any fuel for their fractured and unhealed egos to consume. It isn't as if they will put ME on ignore. lol They NEED the arguments in order to feel normal. We've got some give-aways that will be taking place soon and it will require posting in my thread to participate, and no one on my ignore list will even be seen... so that will be fun!
I'm on the side of refraining from ignoring other members. Never have myself. It seems weak and a possible expression of manipulation and control ...
Thanks for the balancing view. I have nowhere near your forum experience and get what you're saying. It doesn't sound like you abuse the feature. Someone wiser than me put it there. It's the abuse I'm speaking to - as in used as a weapon. I made some edits to my post to clarify.Myself, I'm all for use of the ignore feature on a forum. It's merely a setting that allows one to more-easily skip over a seemingly offensive poster's remarks. It can be called whatever folks want, but for people looking to not see a certain poster's content it can be a useful feature.
Have used it, occasionally, on a handful of forums over the past 20+ years. It's funny (or sad), how frequently accounts I've placed on my ignore list end up getting banned by the management.
I'm all for accepting a wide range of views and perspectives. I won't listen to abuse, incivility, threats or unjustifiable whining. Such people can have at it, within the tolerance of management. But I won't participate with it, even to the point of listening to (reading) it. Works well enough.
I'm on a highly-active forum, elsewhere (different topical content), and I've got countless dozens. But there are tens of thousands of actively-posting members on that forum. And, as with any group, there'll be a few who chafe. Over the years, the ignore feature has made that forum tolerable. Without, there's simply too much sniping and nastiness (from a few hundred such members) to make it worthwhile.
We should be glad the feature exists, on most forums. As with the "report" feature (to notify management), it can be useful.