WildRose
Well-Known Member
I've mentioned before that I never bought into the 6.5 hype until doing some research back to the early/mid 1900's and how effective the 6.5's of that era were.That say a lot right there.
Take the 6.5 need more. I know guys (and on forums) that if you don't have a 6.5 nm, you don't have a rifle worth having.
If I wanted a 6.5 it would be in 264
But I am thinking of a 260 for my wife.
I then bought a .260 and shot it exclusively for a year on game.
The Swede, "Needmore" and .260 are pretty much ballistic equals. There's a huge advantage though in ammo and brass availabity for the CM over the others though due to it's popularity.
The .264 stood alone for high velocity 6.5's on the major commercial market for decades suffering only from slow twist barrels made for 120gr ammo and the metallurgy of the era earing it a "barrel burner" reputation.
The 7mm RM then came along and left it in the dust.
The .264 is still a great choice for just about any four legged critter in North America safe perhaps the Grizzly and Kodiac but even they have been taken successfully with it and other 6.5's like the Swede.
Fortunately I bought up enough .260 Lapua and Nosler Brass that I'll likely not live long enough to run out.
The wisest choices today though in 6.5's are probably the 6.5CM and 6.5PRC because of mild recoil and endless availability of components. They both have enough popularity and factory support to have real staying power in the market.