elkaholic
Well-Known Member
I found 8133 to be slightly slower than Retumbo and I couldn't get es down with it.6.5 sst data with 142smk - 143eld-x - and 147eld-m with loads using Retumbo are interchangeable with imr 8133...such as 59.0 grains of Retumbo with 147 eld-m/cci 200/@ 2.810" coal ...can also use imr 8133 59.0 grains/147 eld-m/cci 200/@2.810" coal... I've been able to shoot .5grains more with imr 8133 than with Retumbo without reaching too high pressure. The IMR 8133 is a smaller & more dense spherical powder grain than the Retumbo which I've found can take up a little too much room sometimes resulting in a compressed load, whereas the 8133 will not be a compressed load using equal loads as Retumbo.