I really welcome any discussion on scope ability(s).
I have many rifles that I pull out of my gun safe upon demand, so I don't switch scopes from rifle to rifle preferring to pull a rifle out of the safe that is sighted in with corresponding data for up to 1,000-yard use. Some time ago a proven high production executive having much experience making stuff work suggested that I should sell off many of my scopes & buy 1 scope for 3-4 rifles & switch them upon demand. He observed the contents of my safe with many scopes having gold rings. This sort of made sense - like get one $1500 - $2000 scope instead or 5, $750 scopes and develop a system to switch scopes among rifles. Got to admit this has merit, Additional discussion followed with an evaluation of scope quality from our back deck over-looking features including road signs up to 800 yards. The discussion became more focused. A request was made to evaluate my best scope, a 6.5-20X50 VXIII with the least expensive, a 16X42 SWFA SS. We looked at various items and came to the mutual conclusion that the Leupold was superior. Then I was asked that how many of the SWFA scopes would be issued -like a need for 100 scopes deployed at the same time vs 3 scopes. I don't have100 rifles. At that point the young daughter, having 20-20 vison peered thru all the scopes that were mounted on tripods vs rifles and looked at western meadow larks (melodious songbirds, indigenous to western USA). The Leupold prevailed. The next question was before going on a shoot are the scopes checked out - either yes or no. This was followed by request to explain a sight-in procedures. This was provided - like 3 rounds at 100 then 3 more at 300. Then I was asked if I had any rifles in the safe that needed to be deployed for immediate situations -yes, an AR type & a .22-.250. The executive guy was a fast learner and quicky picked up on mounting systems. The end question - a $3,000 scope vs. 5, $750 scopes given an established sight in system. I always wanted a Schmidt & Bender.