ShtrRdy
Well-Known Member
It's possible your neighbor mentioned something else that you're leaving out. For example he uses the reticle to hold over on longer shots.
Run. Don't pass goal just plain Run. As already suggested there may something in the info you were told that you missed. But with the info you have, Run.Hi all my name is Keith Fleming & live in N.H. and just started learning precision shooting with a Savage .22 mag. I am working my way up to larger calibers & reloading but for now My Savage with an Arken on top is working nicely! I am writing because as I was telling my my know-it-all ex Airforce guy neighbor about shooting he told me about "some expert shooter" he knows does his reloading so when he shoots he always aims at the bullseye , meaning he has loads that hit@ 100 up to 1000 depending on his powder ...." because he hates messing with his scope" This all sounded like a big load of " I know it all BS" but I figured I'd come here and ask if you guys have heard of this? Is it a reality? Sounds dangerous if the target is close enough! ....Thoughts?
Yep, he could do it if the barrel on his rifle was a battle ship turret........Maybe this guy was a loader on a Battleship. Shooting 16" guns and putting in powder according to the range of the target. The bags of powder (cylindrical bags). He could load his cartridges with "more or less" powder for the range he wanted.
From one to three Bags of gunpowder propellent (depending upon range) are raised from the magazine in a separate shaft and rolled onto the slide. A second set of three bags for a full charge total of 6 bags is loaded to the slide and rammed home. The amount of powder "Bags" and elevation of the barrel would help hit the target.
This guy that you are talking to -DON'T LISTEN TO A WORD HE SAYS. HE IS VERY DANGEROUS.
But he says he aims straight at the bullseye every shot.......Perspective and likely misunderstanding.
It IS possible.
You could have a book max load zero'd at 1kyd, and then weaker loads that print at 750, 500, 250, or 100.
He would have to hold-off between these exact ranges.
Nothing about this would be easier or more accurate than adjusting a good scope.
That guy must be a 'JENOUS'...
You 2 say that, but why don't you think it's possible! I state this as I load a 264wm with 100 and 140gr and shoot out to 600 without adjusting scope (Leupold old school crosshair). Wind required a little adjusting, but elevation didn't. I really don't adjust optic for wind, only hold with no hold markings. Prairie dog plinking at its finest.He's full of it, plain and simple. You can't magically defy physics with hand loads, and you can't simply load a round with a particular powder charge that gives you the MV needed to keep your scope zeroed at a particular distance lol.
It would have to be using a reticle or one of those "shoots like a laser" loadsIt's possible your neighbor mentioned something else that you're leaving out. For example he uses the reticle to hold over on longer shots.
Try it at 1000, and if the OP was talking about holding over, that's different, and not what seemed to be implied to me.You 2 say that, but why don't you think it's possible! I state this as I load a 264wm with 100 and 140gr and shoot out to 600 without adjusting scope (Leupold old school crosshair). Wind required a little adjusting, but elevation didn't. I really don't adjust optic for wind, only hold with no hold markings. Prairie dog plinking at its finest.
Don't mix them up lolI guess me and this guy are the only ones reloading this way? It is a pain to carry so many different loadings but that's what backpacks are for.