ndking1126
Well-Known Member
Was yours measured by a certified scorer?Not trying to bust em, just giving you a reference.
Was yours measured by a certified scorer?Not trying to bust em, just giving you a reference.
It does look like a monster. Especially given the inside spread I would think more than 155. But yeah, me watching one video on youtube doesn't count for anything and it's not a big deal to me either way whether 110 or 140. Thanks for posting!Nope just me, I don't care that much but I followed the B & C and measured a few times. I've measured others and taken a look at certified racks, I can't be off by too much.
Just like the Fisherman......holding one arm outstretched from his side saying.....AND IT WAS THIS BIG!That's a 155" mule deer. 138" no way. Hard to know exactly without all the numbers.
Looks like a three year old buck, a lot of times the other side would be a two or three pt. I would be surprised if it scores over 130 just my opinion . Guess i'm going to have to figure how to post pictures ,iv'e tried but can't get it done.
I agree that your estimate of 130" buck is likely close to what that buck would score. Deep forks are what make a deer score high in B&C and this shed doesn't have deep forks. Spread also has very little effect on score. I killed a 190" buck in Colorado a couple weeks ago that was only 23" wide. A couple years ago I killed a buck in Colorado that was over 30" wide but would only score around 140" because it didn't have deep forks.
It is difficult to estimate age based off a shed. My guess is that would represent average genetics for a 3 1/2 or 4 1/2 year old mule deer. It could be a 2 1/2 year old deer with excellent genetics or a 7 year old buck with bad genetics.