Pressure signs way below max load

I'm not proud about that decision either ...
I ain't bashing u brother but man if u are piercing primers u could get hurt brother. I have always found good nodes between 75.5 and 76.5 with around that weight of bullet. Ease back and run u a good test with say 75 thru 76. I know this ain't everyone's thing but I do seating depth way farther out than book first so I don't run into running out of case capacity. Start at say .020 off if your mag will allow and then run your test.
 
Carbon ring? Seems anytime someone is showing pressures "too soon" with different loads, it eventually turns out to be a nice, hard, going-to-take-hours-of-scrubbing, carbon ring rearing it's ugly head. Just a thought...
 
473C40DD-D0A4-41F3-B0D1-1FEEE060F0DD.png
This is with 208s but u can get the idea.
 
I ain't bashing u brother but man if u are piercing primers u could get hurt brother. I have always found good nodes between 75.5 and 76.5 with around that weight of bullet. Ease back and run u a good test with say 75 thru 76. I know this ain't everyone's thing but I do seating depth way farther out than book first so I don't run into running out of case capacity. Start at say .020 off if your mag will allow and then run your test.
No offence taken, I appreciate any advice.

Carbon ring? Seems anytime someone is showing pressures "too soon" with different loads, it eventually turns out to be a nice, hard, going-to-take-hours-of-scrubbing, carbon ring rearing it's ugly head. Just a thought...
I dont know what carbon ring is, but if you're referring to cleaning the rifle, I do it every 20-30 rounds.
 
CBTO measured multiple time with Hornady gauge and sharpie method is 3.7500" with a very slight (.0005) deviation from measurement to measurement. Norma case and Berger 215 VLD hunting.
 
I'm just following along here. You said back in post #6 you are running coal way UNDER what the book says. This means to me you are seating the bullet DEEPER into the case than the book and thus drastically decreasing the volume of your case and this would definitely cause higher pressures at lower gr of powder.
Do I understand what you are saying correctly?

Darrrell
 
I'm just following along here. You said back in post #6 you are running coal way UNDER what the book says. This means to me you are seating the bullet DEEPER into the case than the book and thus drastically decreasing the volume of your case and this would definitely cause higher pressures at lower gr of powder.
Do I understand what you are saying correctly?

Darrrell
Sorry what I meant to say is that I seat my bullets according to the book, for example eldx 212 is seated at 3.5, other at 3.34, which is way below measured CBTO 3.7500. I don't jam the bullet nor seat them under 3.34 or 3.5 in the case of eldx 212
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top