We offer multiple options to become a Supporting Member here.
Unless the case was full and you didn't see pressure signs with n570.But.. you will be slower soooo.......
H4831 SC | 0.4301 | |
RL25 | 0.384 | |
N560 | 0.371 | |
H1000 | 0.366 | |
Ramshot Mag | | 0.345 |
RL26 | 0.3397 | |
Acc Magpro | | 0.3342 |
Retumbo | 0.337 | |
N565 | 0.3109 | |
IMR8133 | 0.3 | |
N568 | 0.3 | |
Ramshot LRT | | 0.285 |
N570 | 0.277 | |
RL33 | 0.267 |
I wasn't making a burn speed comparison. Only comapring the how h4831sc can fit more powder in a case than h4831. Sorry for the confusion.
H4831 SC 0.4301RL25 0.384N560 0.371H1000 0.366Ramshot Mag 0.345 RL26 0.3397Acc Magpro 0.3342 Retumbo 0.337N565 0.3109IMR8133 0.3N568 0.3Ramshot LRT 0.285 N570 0.277RL33 0.267
As you can see, H-4831 SC is way at the top of this burn rate ranking. Its way faster than N568 by a mile.
I had it wrong, N568 is closer to N565 than to N570. and is exactly the same Ba value as IMR 8133.
I like ranking powders this way by Burn rate value out of Quick Load
Yep. Exactly what I mean.You would need 1.5 grains more 568 to achieve the same speed from the experience I have.. but yes, you would be correct on that