I shot Barnes way long before I started shooting and praising Hammers. and that is a fact not based on any feelings. I don't take offense or care what any ones choice is but let's keep it factual and civil . I think most of us here have pretty much the same interest.I still find it hard to believe that you high praise all things Hammer quoting folks can't accept the fact more than one company makes mono bullets.
I shot Barnes way long before I started shooting and praising Hammers. and that is a fact not based on any feelings. I don't take offense or care what any ones choice is but let's keep it factual and civil . I think most of us here have pretty much the same interest.
I didn't start it, your BFF ButterBall did. So, why didn't you quote him instead of me? If you truly wanted to keep it factual...
I never made mention of any other bullet just pointing out what seems odd to me but go ahead and get it out of your system. Sounds like you are having a rough day.I didn't start it, your BFF ButterBall did. So, why didn't you quote him instead of me? If you truly wanted to keep it factual...
Uhhhhhh I shot Barnes for years, It's public knowledge here on this siteI still find it hard to believe that you high praise all things Hammer quoting folks can't accept the fact more than one company makes mono bullets.
I never made mention of any other bullet just pointing out what seems odd to me but go ahead and get it out of your system. Sounds like you are having a rough day.
Yes Sir I did but in no way did I try to compare it to the CBB in any way, I was characterizing a dedicated high BC bullet fanatics on this forum. I know everyone synthesizes information differently but you are off the Res on this oneUhhhh...re-read your post #277...you most definitely mentioned Berger...
Again...you're the one that had to interject nonsense, so looks to me like you just had to get it out of your system?
Yes Sir I did but in no way did I try to compare it to the CBB in any way, I was characterizing a dedicated high BC bullet fanatics on this forum. I know everyone synthesizes information differently but you are off the Res on this one
That what I thought bullet design may be very good just not sure what good the cavity does in anything not needing some more room for powder.tell you the truth... I'd like to see same bullet as a "NCB" (No Cavity Back) and see what it will weigh, (190 gr ? -200 gr ?)
the incisions on the nose of the bullet intrigue me much more than the hole in the back, I can imagine a 200 gr bullet with this profile and 3 incisions opening up like a sawblade & plowing through big game at 3200 fps ...
I'm in my corner neighbor, Have no worries, I just stated a fact looking for a legitimate answer and this what I get, ........ Stay in your corner, and no answer, No biggieSo then what was your point in #277 except to try and stir up unneeded drama?
If you have nothing to add about the bullet/s being discussed, then maybe stay in your corner.
Not that I've noticed. He should look have spent a ton of money with them and they are a very good bullet.Do you have a Cutting Edge thread FEENIX? There's a high BC LR mono. Both hunting and target.
I think we do accept them. They just don't seem to stack up as well when compared to hammers.I still find it hard to believe that you high praise all things Hammer quoting folks can't accept the fact more than one company makes mono bullets.