New Garmin vs Magneto

Here is a link to the Ballistically Speaking interview with LabRadar at the Shot Show regarding the new LabRadar LX.

Enjoy.


Based on the earlier model, being very finicky to aim, missing shots and problems with Bluetooth and other people on the range and just the size, I chose the new Garmin. I made my choice and I will stick with it. The new LabRadar is too little too late.
 
How do you know if either of them compare to a standard? More importantly, what is the standard?
[/QUOTE]

How could there be a 'standard'.....
1...saying you use same ammo in several rifles...they can't all be built exactly the same....
2...using different ammo in the same rifle could not possibly have the same pressures.....

Close....but not exact....
 
How do you know if either of them compare to a standard? More importantly, what is the standard?

How could there be a 'standard'.....
1...saying you use same ammo in several rifles...they can't all be built exactly the same....
2...using different ammo in the same rifle could not possibly have the same pressures.....

Close....but not exact....
[/QUOTE]
Think he's trying to imply a know velocity and tested against it. It's a simple time and distance calculation but is there an accuracy gauge or calibration. It makes sense I'd imagine all the companies have a way to verify their data but seeking a standard is likely futile.
 
What if the companies are only using reloader 'book speeds'.....

Unless they have rifles that were shot over chronographs and adjusted their equipment from those reading.....lol
 
What if the companies are only using reloader 'book speeds'.....

Unless they have rifles that were shot over chronographs and adjusted their equipment from those reading.....lol
Uh well if anyone is dumb enough to do that god help them. For reloaders the data is pretty easy to determine if it's semi accurate or not. I've not had to adjust velocity using magneto or labs. I imagine the garmin will be no different.
 
All we know is that they are very close in speed. We will know if they are way off bc the calculated drops will not match actual results. But we have no idea if one is more accurate than the other.

High speed cameras may be the way to verify the muzzle velocity, but I'm not sure. If you know precisely how fast it is moving via that method, then you could compare any chrono to that during testing. Or use a verified accurate, high end scientific chrono to compare other chronos against.
 
Last edited:
So you have the Garmin?
Yes sir
IMG_5990.jpeg
 
I've had them all, sold my magneto long ago. Got rid the labradar as soon as the first batch of Xeros shipped to try still get some value out of it. My xero has never missed a shot in last 3-4 months of using it. The new labradar? Too late is my thoughts. Obviously they were sitting on this, or heard about the garmin last spring and rushed to compete. Well aiming the unit will still be a pain, and their app interface is garbage. So long labradar........garmin has been listening to their customers and is adding features and updates within their firmware already. Labradar customer service was almost impossible to get hold of.
 
Top