IF, and I mean a BIG
"IF", they do it, they'll probably just ban rate-increasing devices on semi-automatic rifles, from being able to be purchased after a set date, like they did with the Hughes Amendment and machineguns in 1986. Which was also another piece of illegal legislation the NRA pushed on the American people...Same with FOPA, GCA of 68, NFA of 34, Brady Bill, etc...
The NRA and a tyrannical government is to blame for all of our freedoms taken away since 1934... I guess they all forgot about (most-likely never heard of) the "Dick Act", better known as the Militia Act of 1903.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militia_Act_of_1903
And most importably, I guess they all just conveniently forgot about the words
"SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" written in iron, on that perfectly and carefully crafted document that is the supreme law of the land, called the U.S. Constitution... Which actually makes ANY legislation that goes against anything to do with firearms
ILLEGAL and
TREASONOUS, because it goes against the 2nd Amendment of the Bill of Rights.
The funny thing is, his wording was "ban anything that turns a legal weapon into a machinegun"... Well, the LEGAL definition of a machinegun is any weapon that fires more than 1 projectile per pull of the trigger. Therefore, by the LEGAL DEFINITON of a machinegun, aftermarket triggers and bump stocks don't turn legal semiautomatic weapons into full-auto machineguns, because they DO NOT change the internal mechanics of the weapon. So, I don't really know if he's playing the gun-control/anti-gun crowd for fools and getting them to shut up, by wording it the way he did, or if he's just not wording it correctly, and is serious about banning these items? I'm a bit confused, as he's mind-screwed the liberals many times before, and said he is pro-2A many times before, so maybe that's what he's doing again???