5RWill
Well-Known Member
The LRTS is a lot of scope for the money, doesn't compare to the ATACR. If you don't need FFP you could get the 4-16x50 ATACR. ATACR is a solid choice.Thanks for the replies. I am currently leaning toward either a bushnell lrts 4-18x44 or a nightforce atacr 4-16x42.
For those who asked, my intended purpose is deer sized game out to 600-700 yards.
So they're both heavy
A Zeiss conquest v6 3-18x 50 weighs 22 ounces
Food for thought
We have a V6 the reduced weight is nice. Glass is good for what we paid but not up there with the ATACR. My only worry is that ours isn't tracking properly. I zero'd my dad's SAUM at 100yds, ran it out to 600yds to get DOPE. Let him have at it. He kept missing deer, i thought it was because he didn't have the range finder. I finally got it and put it back on paper and had a 10" vertical shift of the likes i've never seen. Rezero'd and haven't had issues since but it was concerning. Will have to keep an eye on it.