Close range ,Nosler BT blow up , Speer Blow up Hornady Blow up ,ApexBlow up Rem core lock blow up , win witnessed this Sat , blow up , no experience with Bergers but from what I've heard , close range , blow up . All the others I've used Barnes and Hammers, Harmmers perform terminally the way I like a bullet to perform and are very accurate foul less and are easy to get a load work up . I haven't seen a Hammer bullet I can't load 100 to 300 fps faster than any other bullet in its weight class. I have and have loaded bullets for any thing from deer to Polar bear each to his own . Excluding Hammers the Nosler Accubond is my next choice bullet .
Gday hardrock
I think you mean amax not apex
Apex fractured & fractured vrs blow up are 2 different things in my world while being the same outcome on big critters which is lack of penertration
I believe mark is working on or may have worked on the fracture component so I don't want to sound like I'm trying to down play his bullets as they work well if we use them appropriately & stay off big bone @ high velocity impact just like so many bullet brands have there weaknesses & I'll include hammers but they have covered more bases than any other brand for me hands down & while still testing you wait till the prototypes are released yep they are good I've yet to find a weakness but give me time more pills on the way
Moving on : & above was all I was going to type but keep looking @ popped up messages since hard rocks post
maybe I should have stopped there
but I've just taken my meds so I'll blame them lol
Man here this place goes again
Oh but this pill has killed thousands or the critter is dead so it's not a issue well to those people just shoot what you want but please understand some people like to move forward & find a better killing pill & some of the newer pills kill way more efficiently than the great old corelox to name one good pill well on my results they have & it's why I no longer shoot them like partition, hmantel gpa , taipan etc Yes the bar has been raised since those days well that's my world results & my thoughts & why I am still searching for the holy grail
I have failed most bullets on the market in critters or @ a minimum found weaknesses (( a few new ones I've not bothered with as my time & health is not what it use to be ) , some true solids I've been unable to fail or along with the prototype hammer but I'm not done yet
Here's a bit of a snapshot of where pills have weaknesses imo these weaknesses can still & for the most part do kill but I'm not one who likes to track , do grid patterns get the dogs to follow up or wait for birds to circle etc as those are failures on what I expect a pill to be able to get done if I do my part on placement
Tips on angles especially bone don't preform well & then the overall pill design comes into play as it bonded or not also plays into this
Tip pills were ones I hated yet the accubond was a go to pill for so many applications due to consistency & the velocity window they worked well in for me yet still had some limitations, the amax was a extremely good killing pill when things went well but when it didn't bets were off yes stay off bone once again comes up that is so critical to help stop erratic results
But tips are great for a consistent product from feeding to trigger squeeze & somewhat more on opening consistently across various resistances than a hp
Hollow points have their down fall also from clogged to nosed over & erratic opening ( I believe this is also hp diameter specific ) with bergers not immune to penciling especially low resistances yes it's not only monos that pencil
the hornady BTHP that if you didn't clean the hp up you got erratic results yet put that in the crease on blesbok & springbok & around 90% bangflops to a couple steps yet come back on shoulder bone & this dropped to around 30% which was still good but then you had to look @ the failures & while small % it was a regular occurrence especially on drives & this is off some fairly substantial numbers taken not single or double digit numbers
Exposed lead tip have their issues from magazine damage to hardness softness of lead let alone jacket & type of jacket angles on bones are also a issue
Protected points dual cores or inserts have their issues
Monos a few designs that behave differently & kill differently some are natorious @ penciling just like I've seen occasionally with Berger on smaller critters
The mushroom variety tend to need more speed to kill efficiently but penertration is seldom a issue but on average these mushroom monos have smaller permanent wound channels
The wad cutter / shedding design the best I've used when those companies get it correct but watch the wad cutter type as your shank here is the key get that wrong & watch turns @ lower velocity occur on certain angles / resistance & wound channel is also relatively smaller if the wad cutter design is not correct
Penertration is one ive found to be a extremely important factor as shallow penertration gets more problems than over penertration yet I get the energy dump idea as I lived by it for years but exits are more consistent killers if you don't have penciling
more & more people are using smaller calibers on bigger critters & even though yes I'm guilty but I do believe no substitute for a bigger diameter & then you can somewhat over come the need to stay off bone eg with hornady a 243 87 gr bthp is erratic on goat shoulders where a 338 250 gr bthp has little difficulty step the 338 up to horses & it's a poor choice & need to stay behind the shoulder but when your chasing horses try staying off shoulder on running shots yes I can't with certainty & I class myself as a pretty good shot on the run so I tip my hat to the ones who can with consistency & go ahead still use your 250 grainers
I like velocity as tof takes risk out of so many things
still room for improvement on every company imo that has pills on the market to the public
It's the behind the scenes work that's going on that's trying to lessen the issues briefly mentioned above or even better stop on every pill brand weaknesses that's the fascinating one for me personally
I know we are so lucky to have so many good pills & everyone shoot what they like but if it's one thing I'd like people to consider is support the smaller companies & while the likes or Barnes, Berger , hornady , sierra, nosler etc ultimately they will not listen to guys like us as they shrug off the less than ideal results that have showed up as they are just to big to give a dam & quality is not as stringent to fine tune for even better terminal results
it's only competition between them that makes them lift the bar on new designs or they just copy or buy out a smaller company who has got some great results
Just my thoughts on them but still value what they are doing for us
For me It's knowing & understanding a pill's weaknesses that we can help lessen the likelihood of a less than ideal results but if we put our head in the sand just take your number & wait your number will be called out one day well it is for the ones like me that can't guarantee I can place that pill exactly where I want it due to animal behaviour &or angles , my shooting ability , climatic conditions etc but then again I'm not worried on my choice of pills these days I just know the bar can still be raised so I try & help where I can to get a even better killing pill that covers more bases than what we already have today , yes I'm greedy !! & probably p—s some off but I want more & believe it's out there ( yes this I know with some certainty)
But that's me & ea to their own & wish them the best no offence intended
Stay Safe & shoot straight
Sorry for long winded post & may have gone over the same thing a few times let alone unclear but my meds are really kicking in so a bit foggy @ present & accept my apology in advance it's just what I've found on my journey & what I push / show to a few that will talk /discuss & tinker
Which ultimately allows me to learn more
Yep I'm a greedy sum of B
Cheers