This came in today and to me it's perfect. Small reticle and the fire dot had varying intensities of brightness. I'd buy again. Good luckCan't wait to hear your report! I would try one if the dot is not too large.
Robby
This came in today and to me it's perfect. Small reticle and the fire dot had varying intensities of brightness. I'd buy again. Good luckCan't wait to hear your report! I would try one if the dot is not too large.
Hunted with the scope yesterday evening for the first time. Light gathering at dusk is exceptional.Watched a doe at about a hundred yards in a bean field that I couldn't see with the naked eye but through the scope would have still been an easy shot. Fire dot is on the money especially with varying intensities of brightness. One can get just a faint dot but still not obscure the target. I activated the internal leveling when I sighted it in and verified that it is correct with a plumb line. Overall I'm impressed. Better glass than my Nightforce NXS at dusk.This came in today and to me it's perfect. Small reticle and the fire dot had varying intensities of brightness. I'd buy again. Good luck
Robby
View attachment 81870
I have the 3-18 x50 non HD that I bought on closeout last year. Always wondered what I gave up vs the HD model in terms of glass/coatings. Seems you have both, what have you noticed in terms of diffrerence in clarity and low light performance?Have VX6 3-18 x 50 ZL with firedot windplex reticle and VX6HD 3-18 x 50 ZL2 with firedot duplex reticle. Firedot appears identical in both reticles and is very small at low levels of illumination in darkness but very effective. As ambient light level increases illumination must be set higher but the dot does not get excessively large as the eye adjusts to the greater level of ambient light. Regarding the post above; I also have a VX6 2-12 x 42 ZL with the firedot windplex reticle mounted on my Tikka M55 .243 and have shot 1.5 to 2.5 inch groups with it at 400 yds without any problem regardless of there being no side-focus. Upside of no side-focus adjustment is that its quicker to get a shot away. That said, if I were intending to shoot beyond 400 yds regularly I would probably go for the 3-18 x 50 due to magnification and light gathering ability.
Speaking as a retired old guy, the price of everything is through the roof insane. Hopefully competition and the next new optic to come along will bring the price down a tad.Paid including tax over $950 bucks for my non HD VX-6 3x18x50mm. I look on Cabelas web page $1,799 for the HD model same power range . That's insanity to me .
https://www.tractoptics.com/products/riflescopesThere is a new company called Track or Toric. You might give them a look.
https://www.tractoptics.com/products/riflescopes
This must be the company that you are referring to.
My bad. Thanks for the correction. That's my upper limit, so almost kills my interest.The Toric 3-15x is 22.3oz claimed weight