Least fussy mono-metal bullet?

Barnes manuals suggest slightly lighter powder charges across the board for their bullets for the increased pressure that's generated. They have the bands that reduce bearing surface too. Is the copper harder in the Barnes bullets?
 
He has been around a while and they seem to be a good bullet. Only played with the 90gr .25 cal.
When you do do your long range testing can you post the distance and what your bc actually was to get to that distance? I've found my hammers land north of what my applied has in the library. I've ran my 300win mag out to just over 1k 1308 I think and was with the 181 hh 10 twist. 1300 I think is farther than i would try on game with it. 1 k I would.
If this is addressed to me, it might take a while as I am doing an actual research study.
 
Barnes manuals suggest slightly lighter powder charges across the board for their bullets for the increased pressure that's generated. They have the bands that reduce bearing surface too. Is the copper harder in the Barnes bullets?
From what I gather yes it is.
That was the thought when people were having them not open on game. I remember reading that someone was drilling a larger hole in the tip and that some would drill fairly easy and then others would be quite hard to drill.
I can say that hammers are a pretty soft copper. I remember Steve mentioning that when they spec out the raw material. Hence why if you accidentally drop a hammer on the tip you can see it deform over not ever seen that with a cutting edge or Barnes.
 
Barnes manuals suggest slightly lighter powder charges across the board for their bullets for the increased pressure that's generated. They have the bands that reduce bearing surface too. Is the copper harder in the Barnes bullets?
Someone would need to get bullets of the same weight and measure the actual bearing surface. I'd also check the diameter as that will affect pressures. Hardness could be checked on hardness tester.
 
I am glad you chimed in. You just confirmed Cayugas' and Badlands' ability to be pushed at a faster velocity.
From the few bullets I have loaded, the badlands bullets end up about like a standard lead hunting bullet as far as maximum achievable velocity, though with different amounts of powder. I have not been able to get them faster, but just in the same general area as standard bullets. The Cayugas I have got way faster than I would expect with a lead bullet, same with the hammer hunters. I have not loaded the absolute hammers, so I can't speak on those.

As far as load developement for me, the PVA's and Hammers have shaken out about the same, easy. The Badlands, particularly the gen II's, have been more picky, with good accuracy still attainable. However, my maximum range is not 500 yards, I killed my elk at 1036 this year, 882 last year, 860 the year before....my co-hunters have been 980, 1002, 513, 680, and so on for the last few years, so BC matters with that consideration, so that is where the Badlands and cayugas come into play.
 
From the few bullets I have loaded, the badlands bullets end up about like a standard lead hunting bullet as far as maximum achievable velocity, though with different amounts of powder. I have not been able to get them faster, but just in the same general area as standard bullets. The Cayugas I have got way faster than I would expect with a lead bullet, same with the hammer hunters. I have not loaded the absolute hammers, so I can't speak on those.

As far as load developement for me, the PVA's and Hammers have shaken out about the same, easy. The Badlands, particularly the gen II's, have been more picky, with good accuracy still attainable. However, my maximum range is not 500 yards, I killed my elk at 1036 this year, 882 last year, 860 the year before....my co-hunters have been 980, 1002, 513, 680, and so on for the last few years, so BC matters with that consideration, so that is where the Badlands and cayugas come into play.
Awesome, thanks!
 
I switched from cup and core to Barnes awhile back. After a few dead run animals and reading up on the mono's I stopped shooting deer in the boiler room and started aiming at the shoulder. DRT results now. Barnes need to hit something with resistance to reach full potential in my experience. I'm interested in the other brand monos but I have so many ttsx's that it's going to be awhile.
 
I am currently shooting Hammers and they have worked well for the few deer I shot. I bought a box of the 122 Cayuga when they first came out but only did a quick ladder test before I put them back on the shelf when Josh said they were designed to be shot into bone for proper terminal performance.

That being said when I tested them they matched up pretty close to the 123gr Absolute Hammers with the same loads.
 
Not being defensive like I said Here we go again nothing personal you can't compare velocity and bullets the way you posted we all know that the absolute Hammers usually require a faster powder and more of it and get as much as 150 too 200 fps more vel than the Hammer Hunters I've done my homework on the Hammers they are a different animal and a experienced hand loader will find this out when and if they try them my apologies if I offended you have a nice day
I posted exactly as-is to make a point; one cannot know how fast the bullet can be propelled with the same powder/load configuration. As you noted, an experienced handloader will have to find the best compromise between accuracy and velocity.

No offense taken. Unless it has changed recently the LRH community is about learning and sharing. But ultimately, the end-user had to synthesize the information and have the ultimate decision. Cheers!
 
Last edited:
Top