• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

largest case per caliber choice?

Carbine barrels on bolt rifles is a fad with many flaws. It will pass.
ohhhh, I don't know about that. Suppressor availability, popularity and efficiency has made short barrels the perfect choice for me and I'll never change.
I shoot plenty of 24-26-28" rifles for competition...all with brakes...but when I go into the field, everything is 18" or less with a can.
In fact, I'm considering a 12-14" barrel for a 22 Creed coyote barrel.

The need for barrel length to hunt effectively was a fad that's finally dying.
 
I have wildcats on the following cases, WSM, Belted mags (full length), RUM & Rigby Improved.
The most successful for me have been the Rigby Improved cases, they start at 30 then 338, 375 & 408 (still developing that one).
Have considered 7mm, but the 7RUM is ample case capacity.

300 Weatherby for 6.5mm is ample case capacity, or even a 6.5STW, which I had several years ago. Have done a 6.5-270 Weatherby, but that and 264WM are neck and neck.
I really love my custom 264WM, it is amazingly accurate.

Cheers.
I have a pair of 6.5-300 Weatherby magnums and love the round. It is accurate and blazing fast.
 
ohhhh, I don't know about that. Suppressor availability, popularity and efficiency has made short barrels the perfect choice for me and I'll never change.
I shoot plenty of 24-26-28" rifles for competition...all with brakes...but when I go into the field, everything is 18" or less with a can.
In fact, I'm considering a 12-14" barrel for a 22 Creed coyote barrel.

The need for barrel length to hunt effectively was a fad that's finally dying.
Longer barrels were more common for rifle balance and handling, to gain factory specs from the cartridge and they also maximised burning characteristics for the powder charge which reduced muzzle blast also keeping that blast further from your ear.

The day John Rigby starts putting a can on their new carbine stalking rifle will be the day this argument is won.
 
Longer barrels were more common for rifle balance and handling, to gain factory specs from the cartridge and they also maximised burning characteristics for the powder charge which reduced muzzle blast also keeping that blast further from your ear.

The day John Rigby starts putting a can on their new carbine stalking rifle will be the day this argument is won.
 
As I age lighter is better. Who knew that I would shred my favorite 300 WM with a 26" barrel for a 300 WSM with a 24" fluted stainless with a recently acquired carbon fiber stock which shed enough weight to make it under 8lbs with scope and I wish it had a 20" barrel.
I like the 300WSM because it is efficient in the shorter barrel and shorter action. I wish the 300 RCM would have been more accepted but the 300 WSM is the next best thing IMHO.
I guess I am currently considering something like a NULA with anywhere from 18" to 20" barrel. 300 WSM would be nice.
Ps. My deer rifle is a Rem. Model 7 in .308 Win with 18.5" barrel sporting a new Stockys Carbon fiber hunters stock. I have hunted with it for 35 years and never felt at a disadvantage. I have taken many deer, moose and caribou with this rifle. One particular memory of a caribou at 440 yds in January on the Hudson Bay tundra is special.
My first bolt action was a Remington 700 with a 20" factory ordered barrel in 1974. Who knows maybe it was a trend.
Weatherby introduced a short barrel 7mm Rem in the Vanguard in the early 80's and I got to play with one.

It proved 3 things:
1. Muzzle blast increased.
2. Factory specs for the cartridge were lost.
3. The same slow burning powders produced the best results and faster burning powders could not make up velocity in the shorter tube. That myth still continues occasionally today.
 

Recent Posts

Top