Been shooting the 257 Weatherby for about 30 years now. It set the bar pretty high for shooting fast and flat, it's still tough to beat by much even after all these years of "improvements".
Been shooting the 257 Weatherby for about 30 years now. It set the bar pretty high for shooting fast and flat, it's still tough to beat by much even after all these years of "improvements".
Been shooting the 257 Weatherby for about 30 years now. It set the bar pretty high for shooting fast and flat, it's still tough to beat by much even after all these years of "improvements"
Times 2
ohhhh, I don't know about that. Suppressor availability, popularity and efficiency has made short barrels the perfect choice for me and I'll never change.Carbine barrels on bolt rifles is a fad with many flaws. It will pass.
"No replacement for displacement".I made a 6.5-.338 RUM and a 7-.338 RUM. Why? More velocity. Like they say in drag racing: No substitute for cubic inches.
I have a pair of 6.5-300 Weatherby magnums and love the round. It is accurate and blazing fast.I have wildcats on the following cases, WSM, Belted mags (full length), RUM & Rigby Improved.
The most successful for me have been the Rigby Improved cases, they start at 30 then 338, 375 & 408 (still developing that one).
Have considered 7mm, but the 7RUM is ample case capacity.
300 Weatherby for 6.5mm is ample case capacity, or even a 6.5STW, which I had several years ago. Have done a 6.5-270 Weatherby, but that and 264WM are neck and neck.
I really love my custom 264WM, it is amazingly accurate.
Cheers.
Longer barrels were more common for rifle balance and handling, to gain factory specs from the cartridge and they also maximised burning characteristics for the powder charge which reduced muzzle blast also keeping that blast further from your ear.ohhhh, I don't know about that. Suppressor availability, popularity and efficiency has made short barrels the perfect choice for me and I'll never change.
I shoot plenty of 24-26-28" rifles for competition...all with brakes...but when I go into the field, everything is 18" or less with a can.
In fact, I'm considering a 12-14" barrel for a 22 Creed coyote barrel.
The need for barrel length to hunt effectively was a fad that's finally dying.
Longer barrels were more common for rifle balance and handling, to gain factory specs from the cartridge and they also maximised burning characteristics for the powder charge which reduced muzzle blast also keeping that blast further from your ear.
The day John Rigby starts putting a can on their new carbine stalking rifle will be the day this argument is won.
Weatherby introduced a short barrel 7mm Rem in the Vanguard in the early 80's and I got to play with one.As I age lighter is better. Who knew that I would shred my favorite 300 WM with a 26" barrel for a 300 WSM with a 24" fluted stainless with a recently acquired carbon fiber stock which shed enough weight to make it under 8lbs with scope and I wish it had a 20" barrel.
I like the 300WSM because it is efficient in the shorter barrel and shorter action. I wish the 300 RCM would have been more accepted but the 300 WSM is the next best thing IMHO.
I guess I am currently considering something like a NULA with anywhere from 18" to 20" barrel. 300 WSM would be nice.
Ps. My deer rifle is a Rem. Model 7 in .308 Win with 18.5" barrel sporting a new Stockys Carbon fiber hunters stock. I have hunted with it for 35 years and never felt at a disadvantage. I have taken many deer, moose and caribou with this rifle. One particular memory of a caribou at 440 yds in January on the Hudson Bay tundra is special.
My first bolt action was a Remington 700 with a 20" factory ordered barrel in 1974. Who knows maybe it was a trend.
The day John Rigby starts putting a can on their new carbine stalking rifle will be the day this argument is won.
Good times for sureI made a 6.5-.338 RUM and a 7-.338 RUM. Why? More velocity. Like they say in drag racing: No substitute for cubic inches.