I don't understand why they fine more based on the size. Poaching is poaching, the fine should be the same weather it's a doe or a world record buck.
I tend to disagree. I think the offender should reimburse the public at market value of the property stolen, and make no mistake about it, he stole public property.I don't understand why they fine more based on the size. Poaching is poaching, the fine should be the same weather it's a doe or a world record buck.
Wow! I guess that's what happens when you shoot Kim "the King" Reynold's deer, and the new AG Brenna Bird's office still trying to make a name for herself.I don't understand why they fine more based on the size. Poaching is poaching, the fine should be the same weather it's a doe or a world record buck.
I don't understand why they fine more based on the size. Poaching is poaching, the fine should be the same weather it's a doe or a world record buck.
I'm betting you wouldn't have "poached" the deer. So, no need for an attorney.Wow! I guess that's what happens when you shoot Kim "the King" Reynold's deer, and the new AG Brenna Bird's office still trying to make a name for herself.
18 point?? Looks like a decent 4x5 with eye gaurds.
I would've had a better attorney....
Yes, this was not subsistence hunting for sure. But 50k in fines? My next attorney would be appealing that BS...Not actually. Decades ago, I new people who hunted (poached) with 22's solely for food to feed themselves or their families. The local wardens knew they were very poor and only took for food, so they would ignore their conduct when caught and just give them a "warning". Trophy poachers are taking specific animals for a very different set of reasons.