Okay…. I must have fallen asleep during the video. Did he ever make a point? Am I one of those skeptics? Well maybe. In todays world of technology in our pockets or hands it just seems if they exist, we would have evidence. There is no way that any body or institution could keep it out the public eye. No disrespect intended for those that believe.
Things exist that no one has ever even seen. Things that are seen, often take a long time to "document." Though that doesn't discount the fact that there is much that has never been seen by the eyes of man, and countless things that have been seen that have not been properly documented in such a fashion to provide irrefutable proof. We know some weird creatures live in the depths of the oceans, and prior to very recently with high tech submersibles... people that have seen them and told of them were called idiots. Now, they are vindicated.
Despite the existence of irrefutable proof, some still do not believe. Some do not believe the earth is round, despite irrefutable proof it is. Some deny that the Holocaust happened, yet proof abounds that it did.
In the era of cancel culture and censorship by big tech... you should realize it is not as difficult to keep information from spreading as you think when only one or a few people have the information.
I could make the claim that
you don't exist... and put the burden on you to prove your existence is more than a fictional character created anonymously on the internet. No doubt I would be able to get at least a few people to believe you don't exist. What you believe, is for you alone. We will all answer for our beliefs, and if those beliefs stray too far from truth, there will be consequences. Consequences now and later. Allowing for possibilities that we can't, aren't able, or refuse to understand to exist in our mind is the cornerstone of being open minded and humble.
Basically, it goes like this; If you say sasquatch doesn't exist, and then someone proves it exists... you'll be labelled an idiot and rightly so. You'll then choose to double down and refuse to accept any proof, or change your attitude. Those that refuse to accept the possibility of existence are far more likely to go the first route and just double down on their stupidity.
So, I'll choose to be kind to people that claim sasquatch are real. If they are right, they deserve my kindness. If they are wrong, being kind never hurt anyone and I'll happily error on its side. I'll happily consume any proof that might come to light and allow it to sway my opinion based on the strength of that proof. In the mean time I'll allow the possibility for the existence to keep my mind sharp so I'm able to come to the truth quickly when it's revealed.
What a fun discussion that leads to some very specific sociological and psychological realities people must consider when facing the unknown. How people approach the unknown tells a tremendous amount about their character.