birddog 68
Well-Known Member
You are correct!I forgot to say it's probably Japan
Hellcat made in Croatia. Just picked one up a couple months ago and they shoot good for a small carry pistol don't they!I'm not sure if the Hellcat is.
You are correct!I forgot to say it's probably Japan
Hellcat made in Croatia. Just picked one up a couple months ago and they shoot good for a small carry pistol don't they!I'm not sure if the Hellcat is.
I couldn't find on the pistol where made. Strange. It's one of the pistols I've won. I like it a lot. Better than my Sig 365. I also won a Glock 48 and I like both better than it. Won a Kimber Pro Carry and a Ultra Carry 45. I carry the Pro Carry sometimes but it's heavy . Even with smaller frame and 3 in. barrel. Most time I Carry Hellcat with a 17 rd. mag . One in pipe and a spare 17 rd. mag.You are correct!
Hellcat made in Croatia. Just picked one up a couple months ago and they shoot good for a small carry pistol don't they!
Same here. I was shooting a steel plate at 96 yards with it this week. Mine shoots alittle left.Hellcat made in Croatia. Just picked one up a couple months ago and they shoot good for a small carry pistol don't they!
I found it. Left side at end of slideYou are correct!
Hellcat made in Croatia. Just picked one up a couple months ago and they shoot good for a small carry pistol don't they!
I ordered the latest data set for QL tonight. Some hope that Stabal HD is in there. Will post back if it is. (its listed as new from 2/4/2014, but last I was on Neconos, I did not see any such update, and that was a couple weeks ago, max) In my 7 RM 175 ELD-X, N570 is showing the best theoretical velocity (in my long throat and decent capacity magazine) but at a 104% fill. Data from Hodgdon site for 7 RM and Stabal HD show decent velocity, but hard to compare to QL given different seating depths, barrel length ect.
The earlier posted burn rate chart is interesting -- if Stabal HD is truly the close in burn rate to Retumbo, N570 etc, then it solves a problem for me -- I cannot seem to get enough of those in the case without the bullet slipping back out from compression. I use graphite on my necks, and a mandrel (after bushing sizeing, FL with .002 shoulder bump). I think my necks are a little loose for using with a compressed load........
This has been my norm for using magnum primers as well. I have been trying Mag primers in some lighter loads for a while, I tried Remington 9 1/2 M's in a 6 CM load of 42 grains of 6.5 StaBall. Had an SD drop from mid teen's to mid single digits, picked up a little velocity but nothing not much. Granted this is one barrel and one load. But hey, one more rabbit hole to throw money into.I've read ball powders are better suited to magnum primers. What I've done if 60.0 grs. or more.
I did a test with chrono with a 6.5 PRC couple years ago. I posted on here on some thread. Everything was same. Rifle, powder charge, case and bullet. I used Fed 210M, CCI BR4 and Fed 215M. Load was if I recall 55.0 grs. RL26. A 156 Berger. ADG cases. TheThis has been my norm for using magnum primers as well. I have been trying Mag primers in some lighter loads for a while, I tried Remington 9 1/2 M's in a 6 CM load of 42 grains of 6.5 StaBall. Had an SD drop from mid teen's to mid single digits, picked up a little velocity but nothing not much. Granted this is one barrel and one load. But hey, one more rabbit hole to throw money into.
I am just about to work some loads up with Staball 6.5 for my buddy's 6.5 CM using 140gr SGKs. How many grains of Staball 6.5 are you using and what bullet are you flinging? I'm thinking working up to 44gr max.Installed QL data update, dated 2/5/2024. Wasted $18.95! Oh well. That's cheap compared to the other stuff I spend money on with reloading and guns. Still no support for Staball HD.
There is a text file included with the download that tells you when various stuff has been added. Goes back to like 2020 and is in chronological order. You'd think they could post that dang file at Neconos so you would know what you were getting.....
I like QL, but the support is weak to say the least......
To be clear -- it DOES have current support for Staball 6.5. I used it to cook up a load for my buddies 6.5 CM that exceeds our prior velocities with H4350 by 100 fps using Staball 6.5, and is more accurate (under 0.4 MOA, 5 shots, possibly better as in exceeds shooters ability)
That's where I stopped with 143 grain ELDX, and I am well pleased, good velo, and super accurate. Haven't shot much past 300 yards with it yet, but anything within that time zone is on borrowed time. I use it mainly to protect my chickens lol.I am just about to work some loads up with Staball 6.5 for my buddy's 6.5 CM using 140gr SGKs. How many grains of Staball 6.5 are you using and what bullet are you flinging? I'm thinking working up to 44gr max.
Yeah, 44.2 Staball 6.5 got an ES of around 12, fps ave of 2825 over 15 or so shots. My buddy (his gun, shot a 100 yard group of 4 at 0.6, my group in his gun was 0.38) This was virgin SRP Lapua brass. Necks were chamfered. Nothing else. Then mandreled with Sinclair .263 steel (not the fancy nitrided ones). Used graphite for lube, as is my custom. Hate cleaning off lube.That's where I stopped with 143 grain ELDX, and I am well pleased, good velo, and super accurate. Haven't shot much past 300 yards with it yet, but anything within that time zone is on borrowed time. I use it mainly to protect my chickens lol.
Ha ha ! That's the ticket! Thanks.That's where I stopped with 143 grain ELDX, and I am well pleased, good velo, and super accurate. Haven't shot much past 300 yards with it yet, but anything within that time zone is on borrowed time. I use it mainly to protect my chickens lol.
Hey what's your load data? If you don't mind me asking. I have a prefit coming in 7saw soon and I have 6 pounds of staball and was planning on giving it a shotI've had great luck with it in my hunting rifle 7SAW with 162 ELDM'S.
I'm in the process of finalizing a 65Creed load with 147's.Single digital SD'S & 175fps over my H4350 load.
Playing with seating depths to try and tighten groups up just a tad.