Vortex!
Well-Known Member
. You do bring out an excellent point but as you said it is still tempting!Well said Feenix. I am as guilty as anyone for using target bullets on game justifying it by the high BC or better accuracy. Even though I know better, I am contimplating using the 6.5 150gr SMK this year because of BC and great accuracy from my rifle.
That being said, by selecting an appropriate long range bullet design we will more likely experience the best of both worlds; penetration and vital organ damage. Rather than the thin uniform jacket found on most target bullets being used for hunting, jackets specifically designed for hunting will better maintain bullet shaft integrity on impact for greater penetration. Solid copper offers some of the best integrity and penetration but gives up a little BC when compared to some of the lead core long range options, e.g., Accubond LR, eld-x, scirocco.
Granted, I have found the target large caliber heavies like the 285gr ELD-M/300gr SMK 338 to be effective on elk. That much pointed lead/copper with a MV around 3000 fps will generally pass through heavy bone even when surrounded by a thin copper jacket.
Really, most thin jacketed bullets will perform well on deer size game and smaller but I have shied away from using any target bullet, <300gr or so, on elk.
Bullet design plays a major role on the effectiveness of smaller calibers and is the reason we have been able to effectively reach out with them on elk sized game. Companies have put a lot of research into designing hunting bullets to be effective at both short and long distances. We have had great success (one-shot kills) using the relatively smaller caliber 6.5 and 270 premium hunting bullets on elk both up close and at extended ranges. Why not use them when we can.