SuperBruce
Well-Known Member
I have mostly loaded 308 Win so I'm usually trying to squeeze more distance out of my round which may not be necessary with a 280 AI.
For a 280 AI with a 1:8 twist barrel, for me and my tastes, that puts it between the 143 and 155 Hammer Hunters (without the faster twist the latter would be a no-go). There is a lot of 280 AI examples for the 143 and none for the 155. The 155 might not have as much data because of the faster twist requirements but it might also be a bit long for the 280 AI case design (no actual data, only speculation). If I were hunting mostly elk I'd personally probably try the 155 HH, or at least poke around to see if anybody else had which would include asking Steve who's ultra helpful, but the 143 should be plenty good and would be the safer bet of the two if you're not interested in playing around.
Someone else may have a completely different process, and that's cool too.
- First thing I do it eliminate bullets that require a faster twist than my barrel has.
- Then, I look at the loads people have reported to get an idea of velocity potential: Absolute hammer data here, Hammer hunter data here. This also gives you an idea of popularity which while it isn't everything does mean something.
- Then I put the numbers into a ballistic calculator like shooterscalculator.com to see where the bullets max out for distance meaning having at least 1800 fps velocity (a firm requirement). Note that the 280 AI and 7mm SAUM are nearly ballistic twins so you can use those velocities for an estimate of the 155 HH velocities you can expect.
- At that point, I typically am most interested in the bullets with a healthy amount of energy left at my max distance.
For a 280 AI with a 1:8 twist barrel, for me and my tastes, that puts it between the 143 and 155 Hammer Hunters (without the faster twist the latter would be a no-go). There is a lot of 280 AI examples for the 143 and none for the 155. The 155 might not have as much data because of the faster twist requirements but it might also be a bit long for the 280 AI case design (no actual data, only speculation). If I were hunting mostly elk I'd personally probably try the 155 HH, or at least poke around to see if anybody else had which would include asking Steve who's ultra helpful, but the 143 should be plenty good and would be the safer bet of the two if you're not interested in playing around.
Someone else may have a completely different process, and that's cool too.