- Joined
- Aug 15, 2017
- Messages
- 1,277
With the ease of finding sweet spots with these bullets I've ordered some for my 30-30 in hopes that it will also come with ease. Wish me luck.
I've loaded all the bullets you have mentioned and I disagree, The Hammers are by far the easiest to develop a load for, and you are correct as there is no magic but Hammers are a game changer like it or notBCs are not what's claimed. Similar to Accubond LR when they first came out, 180 ELDm etc. actual bc is not what is stuck on the box.... kinda like how berger says you can shoot a 1:9 with the 195s... yeah you can if you wanna lose 5-15% if the BC.
The hammers ive played with did not meet published BC. They shoot pretty well but I'm staying away as a long range bullet. Those saying that Hammers are the easiest bullets to load for ever obviously have no played with Sierra game kings TMKs, game changers etc.... just like everybody else Hammers have their cult following. So does berger so does hornady so does nosler. Take everything you read with a grain of salt. There is no magic in this game.
In my mind to qualify as a game changer, they would meet published BC. But I suppose the term varies person to person. Like I said, very good hunting bullets. Marginal at best LR bullets. Seeing as this is a long range forum and all one could see where that would make a less than "slippery" bullet less appealing.I've loaded all the bullets you have mentioned and I disagree, The Hammers are by far the easiest to develop a load for, and you are correct as there is no magic but Hammers are a game changer like it or not
I've shot the 30 cal 124 HH to a 1000 yards and the low BC was some what equalized by the velocity gains and I will say I have never had a bullet hit the plate as hard as the Hammers, not even comparable, so once again I disagreeIn my mind to qualify as a game changer, they would meet published BC. But I suppose the term varies person to person. Like I said, very good hunting bullets. Marginal at best LR bullets. Seeing as this is a long range forum and all one could see where that would make a less than "slippery" bullet less appealing.
Rock on with your bad selfI've shot the 30 cal 124 HH to a 1000 yards and the low BC was some what equalized by the velocity gains and I will say I have never had a bullet hit the plate as hard as the Hammers, not even comparable, so once again I disagree
Excuse Me ?Rock on with your bad self
Seems like there's one in every thread here lately! And he's brand new!Excuse Me ?
Kinda what I thought tooSeems like there's one in every thread here lately! And he's brand new!
Maybe my misinterpretation.Kinda what I thought too
No I think you hit the nail on the headMaybe my misinterpretation.
Hard to say, He seems awfully sure of himselfMaybe 1894C doesn't know BC can and does vary in different barrels. Maybe he lacks experience.