- Joined
- Aug 15, 2017
- Messages
- 1,277
I like what I seeing with the Hammer Hunters and eager to compare the 6MM with the DTACs I use once they come out in Target bullets.
We will for sure. The plan is to have a full line. We will work on development hitting the most popular calibers 1st. I kinda cringe at the thought of nearly doubling the number of bullets we offer.I hope your working on a 25 cal version of the new design
Growing PainsWe will for sure. The plan is to have a full line. We will work on development hitting the most popular calibers 1st. I kinda cringe at the thought of nearly doubling the number of bullets we offer.
Seems about right on this forum. Disagree with the Hammer Fanclub and you must he inexperienced. Strange that no one recommends a hornady interlock as a LR bullet but hammers with a comparable BC, are more than acceptable, they are recommended.
Again they are very good hunting bullets, but when they start showing up at my PRS and F class matches then we can talk about their long range capabilities being near their competition.
It's amazing how many folks get confused and think this is the Bench Rest Central SiteHow many in PRS and F class spend a buck apiece for bullets?
By the way, have you used Hammer bullets for hunting?
Literally took me 7 rounds to develop a load in my 7mm Rem Mag with 143 Hammer Hunters. I bracketed my 145 LRX load, which was 64.8gr RL23. I shot 64,65,66,66.5 with my mag speed, 65 and 66 touched at 200 yards.
I'd try the exact same load if it were me, if it'll fitOk so I am shooting my 6.5-300 Bee this weekend with the .264 Cal-131g Hammer Hunter .
This is my load with the 127 LRX.
COAL 3.590"
Based on this what would you load????? For a quick load work up.
Gun is a MK V Accumark from their custom shop.
Thanks in advance!!!
That's the safe bet ShoNuffI was thinking of dropping to like 86 then 86.5 then 87 87.5 pending on pressure.
Just make sure your not shooting over a hundred yards as them Hammers aint very good at long rangesCool