CanardNoir
Well-Known Member
And I forgot to mention a good Kestrel when trying to make a real long-range shot above sea level...First - understand that liability concerns have affected all factory ammo producers as their lawyers have moved them to err on the side of safety.
Second - newer shooter sometimes don;t understand that on-the-box printed ballistics were the product of 24" barrels of a make and model far different from their own; and older shooters often need to be reminded.
Third - those who have been moved to reloading, now rely on actual velocities with chronographs, like the Garmin shown - plus we use powders that are not dictated by manufacturing cost (or availability, because we sometimes hoard).
And lastly - some shooters totally disregard the laws of physics and their affects on terminal ballistics.
To your point - short barrels - those less than 24' - don't produce anything near the published ballistic performance on the box! And compounding that problem is the fact that some of us still can't accurately estimate distances and often don't have the immediate-time to use a rangefinder. So our shots are not accurate, nor could they ever be.
The 100-200 yard shots we routinely make in the whitetail-deer woods are chip shots, when we venture out West. And to quote my late-guide from Wyoming, 'Wa' Dunbar - "...this is Big Country..."
Also - the old saw: "You get what you pay for, or sometimes a little-bit less."
Last edited: