I tried that ammo out of my Tikka. Would not group. The only Rem ammo that is accurate are the cheap coreloks.
I tried that ammo out of my Tikka. Would not group. The only Rem ammo that is accurate are the cheap coreloks.
I know someone is going to go there. That was never my intention; my goal was to provide as much pertinent information as possible. If Remington goes the blame route, that's on them, not the OP, esp. if he can verify the integrity of the equipment.What's the over/under on them blaming his equipment?
Sorry about my first post, I didn't see the difference you were talking about until just now. That's ridiculous, you definitely need to call Remington, a refund is in order.So hopefully many/most of you have tested your chosen factory ammo extensively and know exactly what you have. I personally never or very rarely shoot factory ammo, but did so yesterday for barrel break-in on a new rifle. Didn't want to waste my good components cleaning a barrel up, so I bought some ammo at an Academy Sports locally to do the break-in with. I set up my radar on the bench and started shooting. This was an eye-opening experience. These were Remington's Tipped Core-Lokts for the 243 Winchester. If I had bought these to hunt out to 500 yards or beyond, I would have been very angry. Check out the discrepancy between the reported velocity printed on the box and that measured by the raday. That's a LARGE discrepancy!!
That's not at all surprising. What about the SD and ES? How bad were they. That's where the problem arises.So hopefully many/most of you have tested your chosen factory ammo extensively and know exactly what you have. I personally never or very rarely shoot factory ammo, but did so yesterday for barrel break-in on a new rifle. Didn't want to waste my good components cleaning a barrel up, so I bought some ammo at an Academy Sports locally to do the break-in with. I set up my radar on the bench and started shooting. This was an eye-opening experience. These were Remington's Tipped Core-Lokts for the 243 Winchester. If I had bought these to hunt out to 500 yards or beyond, I would have been very angry. Check out the discrepancy between the reported velocity printed on the box and that measured by the raday. That's a LARGE discrepancy!!
22" barrel, 76 degrees at sea level. Yes, conditions may account for a small part of it, but not enough to even question this part of the equation. If Remington is using some powder that's 400 ft/s higher or lower than advertised based on atmospheric conditions in their ammo and charging good moderate prices for it, the intent of this thread still applies... AVOID IT LIKE THE PLAGUE!!...I know it doesn't account for that much discrepancy but I've had temp sensitive powder vary by as much as 100 fps from extreme hot to cold. Might be one variable in the equation. What temp were u shooting in? What barrel length?
What's the over/under on them blaming his equipment?
When I first read the post I thought the same, but 400 fps is more than a little discrepancyNothing to "blame". They have their test barrels and he has his rifle. Not unusual for a rifle to be over or under the published data on factory ammo. It is just a fact that he will not got the same results as the factory published.
Do you blame the manufacturer of your vehicle when you do not get the same gas mileage that was on the window sticker when you bought it?