LOlL, I see it, but that is still your choice to make. If you feel strongly about, go for it.Trolls are often met with harder trolling.
Make a dumb comment, expect a dumb comment. If you get mad about it, then whatever. See the above.
LOlL, I see it, but that is still your choice to make. If you feel strongly about, go for it.Trolls are often met with harder trolling.
Make a dumb comment, expect a dumb comment. If you get mad about it, then whatever. See the above.
I'm just saying.LOlL, I see it, but that is still your choice to make.
I "THINK" its a matter of how we express, and prioritize KE.I know this can be controversial, esp. to the naysayers, because some do not believe in (kinetic) energy transfer and shock, but that's OK. These articles are for open-minded folks willing and able to learn and add to their knowledge base. IMHO, Nathan Foster of https://www.ballisticstudies.com/ effectively captured the interrelationships of:
- How bullets kill
- Mechanism > kinetic energy transfer (Newton's Law of Physics)
- Fast killing
- Hydrostatic/hydraulic shock
- Wound factors
- Bullet weight, diameter, construction
- Shot placement
Part 1, https://www.norma-ammunition.com/en...ted-hunting/ammunition/effective-game-killing
Part 2, https://www.norma-ammunition.com/en...ting/ammunition/effective-game-killing-part-2
275gn 2600fps 330yds
Pretty **** near a bang flop. The blood spot between the legs was the hit. Muzzle Loader.
The bullet .45 (no sabot required) did exit at the neck shoulder junction on the off side. I'm working on recovering the bullet, may be deer may be earth deformation. Curious minds want to know.More details required, that sounds like a nice bullet weight. What cartridge, what bullet, did the bullet exit……."enquiring minds"! memtb
PS: Congratulations on a fine deer!
Any idea what impact velocity was? Goes to question of KE,The bullet .45 (no sabot required) did exit at the neck shoulder junction on the off side. I'm working on recovering the bullet, may be deer may be earth deformation. Curious minds want to know.
Any idea what impact velocity was? Goes to question of KE,
Nathan is the man when it comes to bullet performance. I've been reading his works for quite some time. He also compares bullet effectiveness as body weight increases in game which I find interesting and useful. I too find his work to mimic closely what I see when using the same projectiles at the same velocities in similar sized game.I like nathans work. If you go to his site you will see bullet descriptions by caliber with terminal performance. For example in the 6.5 sweede he lists the old 140 amax as an effective long range bullet. Of course this applies to the creed 260 etc. I have found his results to be similar to mine with the bullets we have both used.