It never happened with M72 .30-06 match ammo since crimping and canneluring bullets was stopped nor with M118 or M852 7.62 match ammo in Garands and M14/M1A semiautos as well as commercial semiautos chambered for either round. Their bullets are 2 to 4 times heavier than those in 22 caliber .223 Rem and 5.56 NATO semiautos yet have the same release force specs.Bart B,
So don't tell me a "uncrimped" full length resized cartridge has never had a bullet move forward from inertia when chambered in a semiautomatic rifle. All it would take is one neck on the thin side and then have a bullet "jammed" into the rifling and raise chamber pressures to dangerous levels.
Pressure test data I've seen for bullets jammed into the rifling produce less pressure than proof loads for both the 22 and 30 caliber rounds mentioned above. Proof loads are not dangerous, just the absolute maximum for safety. I've shot hundreds, if not thousands, of them in Garands. Commercial and military rifles are tested with them.
So, Big Ed, your tirade was misdirected, not applicable to my remarks, but otherwise quite entertaining. I was referring to best accuracy demands. Combat accuracy can be less accurate and has to be more reliable; I agree that crimped in bullets are important. So are the 500 grain or heavier ones in 45 plus caliber hunting rifles as their recoil alone is enough to set bullets forward in the case if they're not crimped. If one cannot manage the quality of their cases to prevent less than needed release force on their bullets, that's a case quality ane reloader attention to details problem, not a bullet problem. Besides, the contamination of the atmosphere by Zombie odors requires bullets and primers be sealed like arsenal ammo is. Otherwise, the powder and primer pellet will be rendered inert by contaminants emitted by Zombies.
Sierra's reason for cannelures on that bullet was conveyed to me by them some time ago. And they told me it was civilian handloaders shooting that 77-grain pill in matches that asked for it. Do you have a link to a MIL SPEC stating the military originally wanted it? If so, that's fine by me. But they don't test them in crimped cases because they don't shoot as accurate.
Accuracy alone was the sole basis for my comments. If you want to redirect it to combat use, that's another bag of worms.
Last edited: