Gotta be very very careful of you let get you goin these days too.It's not hard to get a bunch ****ed off men going.
Gotta be very very careful of you let get you goin these days too.It's not hard to get a bunch ****ed off men going.
I have stated otherwise. Not sure why you think I don't know this ? I am also a little cautious on Trumps part in it. I will not give none of them the benefit of the doubt.If you can't fathom the idea that the democrats may have staged most of the January 6th fiasco you are very naive.
I have dealt with some liberals who will try to destroy people to further agenda. They have no conscious, no moral grounding, and the ends that THEY see as right will justify ANY and ALL means to THEIR end goals.
M1A1ABRAMS I am not saying you are naive, but anyone who thinks staging an insurrection or escalating it is out of the realm of possibility is lost as to the evils in this world.
Saying the article you posted is a definite likelihood.
I would argue that trying to overturn the election would be what one would consider "taking away Democracy". But I guess I'm not the one thinking so clearly like the all the Mensa's on this thread....It's funny how Democrats are saving Democracy by taking away Democracy.
And you would be absolutely correct.I would argue that trying to overturn the election would be what one would consider "taking away Democracy".
It can get a little testy. lolAnd you would be absolutely correct.
However, what if said election was proven to be a fraud? Not saying it was, just trying to see both options.
And with that, I'm out…..we not supposed to be discussing politics anyway. And I see why!
Who was trying to overturn the election ? People wanted the fraud looked into ? Which everyone should have supported. It's not like there wasn't first hand accounts & videos. And rules that got changed at the last minute. When have we ever counted ballots that were received after the election ?Here ya go Muddy
I would argue that trying to overturn the election would be what one would consider "taking away Democracy". But I guess I'm not the one thinking so clearly like the all the Mensa's on this thread....
Trump lost 61 of 62 court cases challenging election results, many of them presided over by judges that he appointed. And filing those challenges is absolutely fine. Once those rulings came back, then it's settled. But no, instead he and his minions tried selecting fake electors, calling election officials in numerous states trying to get them to change their results. But, I know I know, it was the Democrats who did it, right? It's funny how they were absolutely certain that there was fraud, but only in some battleground states that he lost....and only in the Presidential election, none of the down ballot results were ever contested. Weird huh?Who was trying to overturn the election ? People wanted the fraud looked into ? Which everyone should have supported. It's not like there wasn't first hand accounts & videos. And rules that got changed at the last minute. When have we ever counted ballots that were received after the election ?
So then tell me where due process happened in Colorado? Has Trump been conviceted of Insurrection or Sedition? My point is Liberals scream they have to save democracy (which the U.S. isn't), but are willing to take the democratic process away from voters.Here ya go Muddy
I would argue that trying to overturn the election would be what one would consider "taking away Democracy". But I guess I'm not the one thinking so clearly like the all the Mensa's
Yeah that's what the mainstream news said. Yeah I'm sure he knew all those judges personally, lol. I guess I didn't see the fraud because they said so. And I should not believe the poll watchers testimonies. Or believe the facts I posted earlier in this thread. I don't believe most of these judges would even know what they were looking at when it comes to IT. I wonder why the mainstream doesn't tell you how our ELECTIONS are SECURED ? Possibly because people might start looking into what they're doing. How many machines were examined ? The actual machines used on voting day. We didn't hear of all the glitches. Lack of ballots, etc. C'mon Man try looking into it yourself. And quit relying on mainstream for your info. I don't think the WVa national guard could possibly change the results if they wanted to, do you ? Guess who they are affiliated with ? IT-ISAC The military isn't going woke ?Trump lost 61 of 62 court cases challenging election results, many of them presided over by judges that he appointed. And filing those challenges is absolutely fine. Once those rulings came back, then it's settled. But no, instead he and his minions tried selecting fake electors, calling election officials in numerous states trying to get them to change their results. But, I know I know, it was the Democrats who did it, right? It's funny how they were absolutely certain that there was fraud, but only in some battleground states that he lost....and only in the Presidential election, none of the down ballot results were ever contested. Weird huh?