• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

CBTO

Here is my take on it now that we have established that the ogive is not a finite point location of a bullet. Sliding something onto the nose or ogive of the bullet hoping that it will stop at a point of consistency better than inconsistent meplats of many bullets has turned into a marketing gimmick that misleads shooters into thinking they can use this info to chamber a rifle to exact specifications. Then marketed as a must have tool for the loading bench that most people have no use for.
But "for each individual bullet" it can be used as a reference point to establish a seating depth, am I correct?
 
L.Sherm the Whidden bushings are more accurate than the Hornady's?

While this all may be true you still need a point of reference to load to and CBTO is the only point of reference I can think of!
I never said whidden bushings were more accurate than hornandy. What I said was I use the Whidden tool with bushings instead of the Hornandy inserts.
I wanna measure closer to were I figure the bullet is gonna engage the groves of a barrel.
Eric Cortina probably explains it better than I can why he uses a bushing the same size as the groove of a barrel he uses.
As far as bushings go I trust none of them untill I measure them with a deltronice pin
 
I feel the closer you get to measuring were the bearing surface junction with ogive starts theres less variance, and of course manufacturers are not all the same in consistency either.
 
Would this be the tools you are talking about?
 
Would this be the tools you are talking about?
Yes sir, its slick. I also use a dedicated digital caliper that is only used with it to, nothing else.
 
Top