A marginally stable bullet will still be accurate on paper. It's not unstable to the point it's yawing in flight, it's only degraded in BC.
It might be a terrible analogy, but the first thing that popped in my head: putting more spin on a football won't change how much or how little it's affected by someone tipping it in flight.
I just don't believe the physics support that how many RPMs the bullet is at necessarily influences it's path upon impact. The amount RPMs do, however, affect terminal performance to a dregree in the form of centrifugal forces and how much a bullet deforms and/or comes apart. Once petals start to open up or a jacket begins to peel back, more centrifugal force (from higher RPMs) will cause the petals or jacket/core material to reach out wider that at a lower RPM. Of course there are still so many other variables in play it's extremely hard to quantify just how much it makes a difference.