MudRunner2005
Well-Known Member
Apparantly someone else got them....They don't have anymore...I SAW SOME 30 CAL. 210 VLD`s AND 2 BOX`S 7mm 168`s 4 BOX`s 180`s VLD`s SPORTSMAN`s WAREHOUSE CHATT. TENN. LAST NIGHTgun)
Apparantly someone else got them....They don't have anymore...I SAW SOME 30 CAL. 210 VLD`s AND 2 BOX`S 7mm 168`s 4 BOX`s 180`s VLD`s SPORTSMAN`s WAREHOUSE CHATT. TENN. LAST NIGHTgun)
Actually bullet length in and of itself has nothing to do with making a better BC. Longer noses and to some degree longer boat tails yes but raw length actually hurts the BC. Equal nose profiles, meplats and boat tails, yet one bullet is made out of copper and the other jacketed lead and weigh the same. Guess which one is longer. You guessed it. The copper one. Which one has a higher BC? The jacketed lead bullet. Why? Because there is less surface area to drag.
Long bullets have a reputation for having high BCs because longer bullets usually have long sleek noses, sleek boat tails and are on the heavy side. Raw length does BCs no favors.
Originally Posted by Michael Eichele
Actually bullet length in and of itself has nothing to do with making a better BC. Longer noses and to some degree longer boat tails yes but raw length actually hurts the BC. Equal nose profiles, meplats and boat tails, yet one bullet is made out of copper and the other jacketed lead and weigh the same. Guess which one is longer. You guessed it. The copper one. Which one has a higher BC? The jacketed lead bullet. Why? Because there is less surface area to drag.
Long bullets have a reputation for having high BCs because longer bullets usually have long sleek noses, sleek boat tails and are on the heavy side. Raw length does BCs no favors.
And if we compare the 210 LR AB to the 210 Berger VLD the LR AB is slightly longer, however it is also made of more jacket material and a plastic tip giving it a lower specific gravity as well as more bearing surface. My guess is that it is very close to the same BC as the VLD which would make it about .1 in G1 less than advertised.
And if we compare the 210 LR AB to the 210 Berger VLD the LR AB is slightly longer, however it is also made of more jacket material and a plastic tip giving it a lower specific gravity as well as more bearing surface. My guess is that it is very close to the same BC as the VLD which would make it about .1 in G1 less than advertised.
Apparantly someone else got them....They don't have anymore...
Jay. I shot some of the 210 ACLR Bullets today at some distance. I was shooting on sand rocks and measuring the groups with the reticle. I was very pleased. As near as I could tell every shot was under 1/2 moa verticle. Wind drift all under 1 1/4 moa. Most of the shots were at 990, 1315 , 1526. About 35 shots total. In the 300 win mag they shot about half the group size that I get with 190 or 210 Berger's. I was very pleased! This is a message I recieved today from John porter, Sounds like they shoot well, I did ask about the stated bc but have not heard back from him yet. I will keep ya posted. Jay
Do you know what town in ND?I haven't heard anything new, but they have been giving shooting schools in Florida and north Dakota the last week. Joe Cunningham is heading to Africa on Tuesday with a 100 of the 210 loaded in 300 win, should be getting some news on terminal performance real soon. I have talked with a couple of other folks who have been testing them they all say they shoot great but still no hard data on the actual bc, just that its close. I will keep ya posted!
Ok, i am from Dickinson, the SW corner, and didnt hear anything about them coming. I have a friend that says he has shot their rifles and even hunted with them, although this is the same dude who says their system can, and i quote, "kill game easily out to 2 miles."Minot