Bang4theBuck
Well-Known Member
Personally, I feel that bullet performance is judged differently by different people, and you have to decide what constitutes good performance for your scenario. For me, and my experience (12 animals, including those of friends I was with), I prefer for the bullet to deposit all of its energy into the chest of the animal that I'm after. An exit wound, while convenient for easy blood tracking constitutes energy wasted. If I intended to shoot long ways through an elk, or an elephant, I would want a bullet that holds together and goes through as many bones, vitals, non-vitals, nerves, arteries, etc as possible. I dont intend to take that shot. Bullets that dump energy inside the chest cavity mess up things that the bullet never came in contact with, via the hydraulic effect.....that is what I call value added! I may eat these words someday if I happen to have to eat a tag for not having a bonded bullet and not taking a facing shot, or hit a major bone structure unintentionally. There is no perfect bullet, we should only be comparing bullets against what they were designed to do, the evidence of that or lack is apparent when you dress your animal. If an elk runs 250 yards, without any lungs.....all you can do is admire their resilience....