Yep.Lag Time - you are talking about the difference in actual flight time with ballistic drag vs the hypothetical flight time in a vacuum correct?
MODERN BRASS FOR HIGH BC (HEAVY-FOR-CALIBER) BULLETS
Lately companies like Hornady with their PRC cases and Nosler with their high speed cartridges have addressed the need for longer case necks to accommodate longer, high BC bullets so loading them does not compromise the case volume.
So yes, there ARE "high BC cases" and we will see more of them in the future.
Eric B.
That is why I picked the same cartridge, same Berger manufacturer just different weight and B.C. was just trying to compare apples to apples and be fair.
Way to many people get hung up on B.C for hunting.
Todd stole that method for his own by the way. It was first presented to the Army school house in the late 90's by Dan Flowers. I learned it from Dan in 1999. Since ballistic programs weren't yet readily available to individuals, Dan worked it out using Excel spreadsheets.This is why when we make a mph gun wind chart (the original hodnett quick wind) everyone will have a different mph gun depending on variety guns/ bullets being used.
I'm gonna give my 6.5x300wsm as example at 1,000 yards between the 140 and 156 both sighted in at 100 and 10mph cross wind.
140 3220 fps 219" drop and 56" of wind and t.o.f 1.25
156 at 3100fps 225" drop and 51" of wind and t.o.f. 1.25
Now tell me who's good enough to judge 5" of wind at 1000 yards across a canyon and who's not.
I'm not. Next tell me if .304 or .347 is better
And sherm's example is pretty conservative - the difference in BC is only. .043. As soon as you compare a bullet with .25 vs .325 we aren't talking inches anymore at 1000, we are talking feet.I look at it as why add another 5 inches to an already poor wind call, I'll take 5 free inches of help on windage every time!!
I look at it as why add another 5 inches to an already poor wind call, I'll take 5 free inches of help on windage every time!!