Anyone us Boyd’s

[blksno]

Do anyone here use the Boyd's AtOne stock? If so how are the adjustable pieces?

IMO, really really bad. I was supremely disappointed with everything about my AT-ONE sold for a loss just to dump it.

 

[Humpy73]

IMO, really really bad. I was supremely disappointed with everything about my AT-ONE sold for a loss just to dump it.

What was the issue with it?

 

[VinceMule]

If you get the boyd's stock, don't forget the checkering, well worth the money.

 

[Rosebud]

Yes, CZ 453 V 22LR. Had to do so very minor work with a drimel tool. But it fits like a glove now.

 

[308win]

Do anyone here use the Boyd's AtOne stock? If so how are the adjustable pieces?

No problems with mine. Have one for sale that's fits a Mod 70 SA if interested?

 

[blksno]

What was the issue with it?

The adjustable cheek hardware and LOP hardware belong on an air rifle at best. Terrible design is putting it nicely. Very cheap parts over all.
I bought it for a Savage MKII and FOR ME...it wasn't even acceptable for rimfire.

 

[hesse]

I have used 3 of them for hunting builds everything is solid on them. My only complaint is (these where Savage Axis builds for women lop helps on these that is why I use them) you have to pillar bed the front action screw or make a steal shim washer for magazine to work properly

 

[Will.284]

I've never used them. , I went with a pure precision stock . They are amazing to work with and the carbon stock fits like a glove. But they are not cheap. But I didn't have to monkey around with it and a custom 25 oz stock , what's not to like

 

[std7mag]

I've never used them. , I went with a pure precision stock . They are amazing to work with and the carbon stock fits like a glove. But they are not cheap. But I didn't have to monkey around with it and a custom 25 oz stock , what's not to like

That they are not cheap...
Or rather inexpensive.
The affordability of a Boyds stock is perhaps it's greatest selling point.

 

[Will.284]

That they are not cheap...
Or rather inexpensive.
The affordability of a Boyds stock is perhaps it's greatest selling point.

I fully understand. I never said they were cheap and absolutely they are affordable. I've shot a few Boyd's stocks friends have had and they work good , are comfortable. But I'd most likely only use one for bench shooting. I hike a lot and want the weight / strength of carbon and if I have to wait and save $ for a carbon stock then that's fine it's my humble opinion is all

 

[std7mag]

I fully understand. I never said they were cheap and absolutely they are affordable. I've shot a few Boyd's stocks friends have had and they work good , are comfortable. But I'd most likely only use one for bench shooting. I hike a lot and want the weight / strength of carbon and if I have to wait and save $ for a carbon stock then that's fine it's my humble opinion is all

I can appreciate that!!

My Weatherby Mark V Weathermark LT is the lightest rifle I own now (that is legal for hunting).

I really miss the NULA 24B in 280 Rem that I stupidly sold!

 

[mdmiller]

I have lots of Boyds stocks! I have to modify every stock I purchase! Long arms and big hands! The At-One stock when it first came out was a blessing in a lot of ways! Adjustable everything for me, granted I still fit the stock to me and no one else! I will grind and fit it to my hand! They made it easy for LOP and offer an extension for that! Depends on scope I use I modify the comb adjustment! They make lots of accessories now days! Not bad for a 3# stock! Biggest caliber so far on them is 6.5 CM and getting ready to build a 280AI!

 

[Coastal]

I have a couple Boyds stocks that I really like but that At One stock just looks like a 2x4 to me. I just can't get into it.

 

[Will.284]

I have a couple Boyds stocks that I really like but that At One stock just looks like a 2x4 to me. I just can't get into it.

I must agree although I did shoot one a friend has and other than ugly they do work