In most cases, but not all. That being said, I have had Hornady brass that showed ejector marks even when loaded to minimum loads. Some brass or runs of brass are just too soft. And, attempting to determine pressure signs by looking at ejector marks or primer configuration is very subjective. To each his own, but I prefer loading in small amounts until I feel the heavier bolt lift and then backing off a wee bit.Ejector marks are signs of pressure slight or not.
Did you shoot a 10 shot ladder, starting with less powder, to work up to that ejector mark or, did you just load a max book load?I just bought a Remington 700 Long Range in .300 win mag. First off, I shot 10rds of factory 180gr core-lokt ammo (the cheap stuff) just to sight in the scope and shoot a couple of groups. Both groups were just under 1in at 3,031fps. I'm pretty happy with that. Now on to reloading.
I started off using 212 ELD-X's and RL-26. I'm using load data from my Nosler manual with loads listed for the 210gr Accubond LR. It lists a max of 76.0gr, at a velocity of 2,874 out of a 24" barrel.
I have a 26" barrel. These were my readings from my Caldwell chronograph:
Remington brass, CCI-250, 74.0gr RL-26, 3.600 COAL = Avg. 2,926fps with no pressure signs at all.
Remington brass, CCI-250, 75.0gr RL-26, 3.600 COAL = Avg. 2,996fps, easy bolt lift, primer still pretty round on edges, slightest ejector mark barely visible.
I was hoping for good speed, but this doesn't seem right. I didn't shoot the rest of my ammo, which I loaded at 76.0gr of RL-26, for fear of blowing myself up.
What do you guys think about these velocity's?
Anyone with QL care to chime in?
Thanks.
AS you stated the nolser load data was with 24" and your's is 26. I think we all have a chamber/barrel combination that shoot faster then published data and some that shoot slower then published data. I agree with you that ur probably at max, just back off and find your accuracy node. Usually the ones that shoot faster then published will do so with all powders. Just my experience and opinion.I guess my issue here is that my velocities are way faster than what I expected. I've hit pressure before with other rifles/cartridges and the max load and max velocity seemed close to published numbers. The difference here, is that my velocities seem too good to be true. Way faster than any published data I've seen.
I'm not looking to push it any faster. Just weirded out by my fast velocities. I'm currently shooting faster than most of the max loads in my Nosler manual for a 300 RUM!
If memory serves (I'm not near my log-book right now), but I started seeing the 'typical' pressure signs @ the upper 75gr-low 76gr range. I backed off slightly under that to experiment, but the muzzle velocity was still in the 3100 fps neighborhood and that just didn't 'jive' with the rifle at all....groups/velocity all over the place. I worked back down and everything really came together at 73.1gr.I have a 26" barrel. These were my readings from my Caldwell chronograph:
Remington brass, CCI-250, 74.0gr RL-26, 3.600 COAL = Avg. 2,926fps with no pressure signs at all.
Remington brass, CCI-250, 75.0gr RL-26, 3.600 COAL = Avg. 2,996fps, easy bolt lift, primer still pretty round on edges, slightest ejector mark barely visible.
I guess my issue here is that my velocities are way faster than what I expected. I've hit pressure before with other rifles/cartridges and the max load and max velocity seemed close to published numbers. The difference here, is that my velocities seem too good to be true. Way faster than any published data I've seen.
I'm not looking to push it any faster. Just weirded out by my fast velocities. I'm currently shooting faster than most of the max loads in my Nosler manual for a 300 RUM!
Generally speaking, this is true. Generalizations, mixed with assumptions, mixed with reloading is how bad things happen.you will blow a primer before the gun