The one I bought twenty or so years ago I have confidence in, the newer one I bought last year the jury is still out on that one, it just does not appear to be the same quality as my old one. I bought it and put it on a 243 that I was going to try to shoot 100 plus grain bullets at a little more distance than the 85's it likes, and I never could get the rifle to shoot them accurately; so to be honest I haven't had the opportunity to put it to the test, but from aesthetics, to the click adjustments, to the flimsy caps that came with it, I'm just not as impressed as I am with the old scope.I'm Old School. I still use Leupold Mark 4s.
The one I bought twenty or so years ago I have confidence in, the newer one I bought last year the jury is still out on that one, it just does not appear to be the same quality as my old one. I bought it and put it on a 243 that I was going to try to shoot 100 plus grain bullets at a little more distance than the 85's it likes, and I never could get the rifle to shoot them accurately; so to be honest I haven't had the opportunity to put it to the test, but from aesthetics, to the click adjustments, to the flimsy caps that came with it, I'm just not as impressed as I am with the old scope.
That is what I was refering to. Being on oxy for an injury and posting is not a good practice, things get all mixed up in my mind. Sorry!You are referring to the subtensions in the reticle changing with magnification in SFP, not the "turret".
Sorry about the slow reply, I just saw this today. Those are the same turrets on the old and new one I have. For one thing I paid $1200 plus if my memory is correct on my old one, and like $700 for the new one on sale at Midway. And it may turn out to be fine, but the old one appears to be better made.These are the adjustments I have on mine. They seem pretty sturdy and they only have one screw to reset.These don't have caps. We may not be talking about the same scopes.