I will say that most guys make decisions that ultimately hamper their abilities to comfortably accomplish what they need. I have gotten away from full size pistols for hunting. We carry SF glocks (27/29) with extended clips. Small, light and compact. They run on our chests with ease. Is it a pistol that shoots as good as a full frame? Maybe not but the amount of actual field use this pistol will get is hopefully NONE. We bought them for a purpose, we don't shoot them at the range for competition. They run on our chests for hundreds of miles in the backcountry in the fall. Thats it. For this purpose a full size is not necessary. If I get blindsided by a bear I wanted the tight/compact, reliability of a SF glock. You need it to work but you also need to be able to work it. I envision the worst case scenario and that's being under a bear fighting for my life. I don't want a full size pistol, I wanted something right where it counts that is in the center of my body (where I'll be trying to defend) that I can easily pull, stick in the center mass of a bear, pinned down from my back and dump rounds. A large full size g20 on my hip, revolver on my ankle or hanging off my pack belt isn't that in my mind.