Got all my money wrapped up in another build rite now but I would love to have itLee,
Why don't you but it and you can have twin Laredo LRH 7mm STWs like I have twin Sendero 7mm STWs!
Last edited:
Got all my money wrapped up in another build rite now but I would love to have itLee,
Why don't you but it and you can have twin Laredo LRH 7mm STWs like I have twin Sendero 7mm STWs!
Sounds like a plan to meWe should plan a 2013 hunt for 7 stw rifles somwhere where we have about 40,000 acres in the middle of the country or an area that has deer and hogs. It might be fun picking of feral hogs for practice and then a whitetail contest. A campsite would be great. Live off the land and bring your own food to accompany evening feasts.
Looks like the Bergers are the ticket for that rig......Looks like its coming to you now and the "crack" was most likely the RL22, it has a distinctive soundAfter adding some forearm pressure I loaded some 180 Bergers with 78 Retumbo with the bullet on the lands along with the new Barnes 168 LRX using RL22, RL25, and Retumbo. One grain less than max for the LRX and also set them on the lands.
Center spot is the bergers, outer spots are Barnes. It took me 5 shots after switching from Berger to Barnes to get on paper at 100 yards. Off the paper to the right and low. I think I better just stick with Bergers 'cause nothing else seems to shoot. I could set the barnes to box length but I'm not sure there would be enough room for powder, these things are long. Oh, one grain less than Berger 168 max is about max for the LRX on the lands, .7 less than Berger max and it's a bich to get the bolt open.
One thing I noticed, the Bergers had that "boom" sound and the Barnes had a crisp "crack" at the shot. Just one of those odd things I noticed.....
After adding some forearm pressure I loaded some 180 Bergers with 78 Retumbo with the bullet on the lands along with the new Barnes 168 LRX using RL22, RL25, and Retumbo. One grain less than max for the LRX and also set them on
Again 7828 has been my ticket with the 160 class bullets in a 24 " barrel. gun)
I guessed tham all except the 6.5. I thought it was a 270 improved. After using ackleys, any thoughts onthe gibbs version? I have a 25-06 AI, and a 270 AI.
Just so i dont get in trouble on this thread i will say the 7stw is still my newest favorite.
Dijon,
From what I've seen so far, SOCHEM S385 is similar in Burn Rate to our Hodgdon 4831 and is a fast burning powder for the 7 STW. I'm not sure of a starting load for this powder as I've never heard of SOCHEM powders before. Maybe some one with more experience with this powder can chime in.
I see that SOCHEM does have a slowder buning powder called B-12.7 and according to the burn rate charge is most similar to our Retumbo and H870 and would be good fothe heaviest of bullets.
If you are limited to S385, I'd stick with a lighter bullet around 150-165g. as you are not worried about bullet construction and accuracy is your pimary goal, I'd lean toward a Match style bullet. Sierra Matchkings are the easiest to get shooting and are extremely accurate. They make a 150g, 160g, and 168g version. A 168g Berger would serve you well.
The "Silver" brass is Nickel plated and can be reloaded just the same as the Remington brass. Just make sure that you apply enough lube to he case neck and body when resizing them. They are a harder metal than the Yellow brass casings and aren't as forgiving when sizing.
As for perfect grouping loads, I'm still on my own Journey for them..... I'm sure you rifle will shoot quite well, I'll look around a bit more an see If I can find any relevant load data for S385.
Hope this helps,
Dan
Dan,
Am I right in my assumption that for heavier bullets, you need slower burning powders and vice versa?
Bush greetings from SA!
Yes , but it depends on your barrel lenght, a longer barrel will get the most out of a slow powder..... its finding a mix that works ,, Iave also seen a difference on how much the bullet is crimped , tighter crimp= more vel
Dan, you are going to think that I am a num-nut but I am seriously new to all of this reloading jargon and technicalities. What I do have is a steady and sensitive trigger finger, good slow breathing and very good sight. I can take a rifle and shoot well. I am at the mercy of people whom have done this reloading science a while and I am to glad that you guys put up with novices like me.
Will it help if I give you details of my gun?
Bought(imported) original Remington Sendero SF. Lenght of barrel and twists are unknown too me! Can you give me this detail because I cant find it on the Remington webpage?
After the conversion to what is now called Hammerhead, what is left of the original is the barrel, action and trigger. The barrel has been lenghtened with the break at the front and measures 12.6cm or 4.96". All that extra weight which I wanted comes from my stock and maybe a little bit of weight also in the mercury tube. Hammer is really at this stage what we call here in SA, a PLING gun, meaning that I can hold the grip and fire a round and the scope does not move from the target, somehow like my little 22-250 does, the recoil is probarbly also on par.
Give the info you have on Hammer, what do you think I must do for a startup load. I like the idea of match bullets to give me the best consistency with groupings. I dont know if I must worry about massive velocity for the distances which I want to reach?
Ideal world, I would like to shoot a 150-160gr match type of bullet as fast and flat as possible to a distance of 750m and still have enough energy to put down up to an Eland or Gemsbuck in the head or neck-probarbly wishfull thinking but that is where I want to be.
Chat soon
PS: You know I am from SA, where do you live?