.338 Edge data is with long barreled, long throated rifles just like your 7mm SAUM is setup. 99% of the book data with a 7mm SAUM is with a 700 Remington with a 22-24" barrel running at short action OAL. I'm guessing you have a 26-28" barrel and you are a whole lot longer than book specs. Thus you are gaining 200fps over book data. Same thing with a .300 Win Mag, book said 2850fps with a 24" barrel loaded at 3.4" using a 200gr bullet. I loaded mine at 3.650" and shot them through a 26" tube and got 3050fps. No excessive pressure either. Same with the 190s, everyone runs them at 2900 in a .300 WM I pushed mine to almost 3150fps before getting extractor marks. If there's no pressure signs and everything is working, roll with it.
Always been my way too, but I have never run into being over max speed at 5 gr under. Of course I never have built a short mag unless a 22-284 or 6-284 qualifies. This is my first fling with an "EFFICIENT" rig. My STW from back in the 80s didn't do a whole lot more than this thing is and it was a lot more powder in a lot bigger case. Maybe these short mags have a point. I had planned on being at least a few gr over max because of the COAL. Seeing those results backed me up a bit which is a hard thing to do for a guy who usually just loads Retumbo to the top of the case and crushes the largest for caliber pill in it and then has someone else shoot it for him.