Bottom line both are more than adequate for deer out to 700 yards. You have to significantly increase the size/toughness of the animal or the range to be able to say once trounces the other.
Agreed!
Bottom line both are more than adequate for deer out to 700 yards. You have to significantly increase the size/toughness of the animal or the range to be able to say once trounces the other.
In 1994 the internet was mostly knowledgeable conservative nerd engineers with manners.
The pendulum has swung as far away from that as it could.
Think of them as 2 year olds with ego issues, and it is easier to not be bothered.
Oddly enough.... I have forgotten more about electronics than you'll ever know.In 1994 the internet was mostly knowledgeable conservative nerd engineers with manners.
The pendulum has swung as far away from that as it could.
Think of them as 2 year olds with ego issues, and it is easier to not be bothered.
I think that even then, you still won't hardly notice a difference. A well-placed kill shot from either will harvest the animal. I think once you get to a certain animal size/thickness/toughness (adding yardage into the mix, as well) you need to step up to something more formidable for your game.
But to compare nearly apples-to-apples in 7mm vs .30 caliber, the 7mm RM vs .300 WM, and the 7mm STW vs .300 Ackley... Using 180's in the 7mm's and 215's in the .30 calibers, you can effectively take similar game at similar distances with either set of calibers when compared to one another, respectively.
This is just my opinion.
I own 5 .30 caliber rifles... .308 Win, .30-30 Win, .30-06 AI, .300 WM, and .300 Ackley. I am clearly not opposed to .30 caliber weapons. I also have more 7mm rifles than that, in a variety of chamberings, as well... 7mm-08, 7mmRM (multiples), and 7mm STW (multiples). And I will be adding a .280 AI sooner or later.
So, as you can see, my bias towards one or the other is only swayed by my personal preference. I like both calibers. But my allegiences lean towards the 7mm's if I had to pick one over the other. Not because I feel it is better, but because that is simply my preference. Everyone has one.
???
I thought I was agreeing with Lefty and consoling him.
I have built and bought lots of 7mmRM rifles and built and bought lots of 300WM rifles and have hunted with both.
I think that even then, you still won't hardly notice a difference. A well-placed kill shot from either will harvest the animal. I think once you get to a certain animal size/thickness/toughness (adding yardage into the mix, as well) you need to step up to something more formidable for your game.
Was the 895 yards shot a hail Mary?
Or had to practiced and thought you chances were good at that range?
I have only practiced to 600y, but got on at 629 in October with a hail Mary.
At 600 y I can barely keep them on the 10" target.
You don't have to explain yourself or justify the shot, on this forum..I can reach out to 1000 yards with good confidence on paper. Once I got the yardage from my range finder. I used a program on my phone called bullet flight to come up with the correct settings then double checked the math. Dialed up the scope. The wind was calm, and the deer feel in its tracks.